share_log

Institutional Investors Are Shopify Inc.'s (NYSE:SHOP) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$6.6b Market Cap Gain

Institutional Investors Are Shopify Inc.'s (NYSE:SHOP) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$6.6b Market Cap Gain

機構投資者是shopify公司(紐交所:SHOP)的最大賭徒,在上週美國市值增加了66億美元后獲得了回報
Simply Wall St ·  09/23 21:39

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Shopify's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 47% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中持有大量股份,shopify的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 前25大股東持有47%的業務。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

Every investor in Shopify Inc. (NYSE:SHOP) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 65% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

任何Shopify Inc.(紐交所:SHOP)的投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。機構擁有65%的股份,在公司中擁有最多的股份。也就是說,如果股價上漲,這個群體將獲得最多的利益(或者如果出現下跌,將承受最大的損失)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$6.6b in market cap last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 47% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

上週該公司市值增加了66億美元,爲機構投資者帶來了好消息。目前的投資回報率爲47%,而上週的增長令人欣喜。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Shopify.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注shopify的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:SHOP Ownership Breakdown September 23rd 2024
紐交所:shopify所有權佔比2024年9月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shopify?

機構所有權對shopify有何影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Shopify already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shopify, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

shopify的股東名單上已經有機構。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像所有人一樣。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,很常見會看到股價大幅下跌。因此值得檢查shopify的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
NYSE:SHOP Earnings and Revenue Growth September 23rd 2024
紐交所:shopify盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月23日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shopify. Capital Research and Management Company is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.8% of shares outstanding. With 6.2% and 4.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Tobias Lütke and Baillie Gifford & Co. are the second and third largest shareholders. Tobias Lütke, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

投資者應注意,機構實際擁有超過公司一半的股權,因此他們可以集體行使重大的影響力。我們注意到,對shopify來說,對沖基金沒有實質性投資。資本研究和管理公司是目前公司最大的股東,持有8.8%的股份。Tobias Lütke和Baillie Gifford & Co.分別持有6.2%和4.3%的股份。Tobias Lütke,作爲第二大股東,也是首席執行官。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Shopify

shopify的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Shopify Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$6.4b. we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告,內部持有人擁有shopify股票。內部持有人持有價值64億美元的股份。我們有時會對他們是在買入還是賣出感興趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆,包括散戶,擁有公司29%的股權,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面左右一個決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Shopify better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Shopify you should know about.

考慮到擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解Shopify,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。考慮風險,例如。每家公司都會有風險,我們已經發現了Shopify的2個警示信號,您應該了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論