share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:WBA) Latest 3.4% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:WBA) Latest 3.4% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

納斯達克:仁信投資者可能在沃爾格林聯合健康公司(納斯達克:WBA)最新下跌3.4%加劇了今年的損失後採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  09/23 20:55

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Walgreens Boots Alliance's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 考慮到機構在該股票中的大量持股,沃爾格林-聯合博姿的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響
  • 一共有11個投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

Every investor in Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (NASDAQ:WBA) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

納斯達克股票代碼爲WBA的每位沃爾格林-聯合博姿股東都應該注意最大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構擁有公司62%的股權。換句話說,該群體可能會從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或者損失最多)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 3.4% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 56% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the decline continues, institutional investors may be pressured to sell Walgreens Boots Alliance which might hurt individual investors.

機構投資者上週看到其持股價值下降了3.4%。最近的損失爲股東們的一年損失56%添柴,這可能不受到這群投資者的歡迎。 機構通常被稱爲"市場推動者",對於影響任何股票的價格動態擁有重大影響力。 因此,如果下跌持續下去,機構投資者可能會面臨賣出沃爾格林-聯合博姿的壓力,這可能會傷害個人投資者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Walgreens Boots Alliance.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於沃爾格林-聯合博姿的什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:WBA Ownership Breakdown September 23rd 2024
納斯達克納斯達克:WBA 所有權拆分 2024年9月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Walgreens Boots Alliance?

機構持股情況揭示了沃爾格林-聯合博姿的相關信息。

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Walgreens Boots Alliance already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Walgreens Boots Alliance's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

沃爾格林-聯合博姿已經在股東名冊上擁有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。 這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。 但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能出錯。 如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的觀點,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得查看一下沃爾格林-聯合博姿的下面的營業收入歷史。 當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:WBA Earnings and Revenue Growth September 23rd 2024
納斯達克GS:沃爾格林-聯合博姿盈利和營業收入增長至2024年9月23日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Walgreens Boots Alliance. Our data shows that Newcip S.A. is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.1% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有超過發行股份的一半,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。對於沃爾格林-聯合博姿,對沖基金持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,Newcip S.A.是最大的股東,持有17%的流通股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約9.5%的流通股份,第三大股東持有的股份比例爲8.1%。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 11 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

深入研究我們的所有權數據表明,前11名股東持有的股份總計50%,意味着沒有單個股東掌握多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Walgreens Boots Alliance

沃爾格林-聯合博姿的內部股權情況。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own US$30m worth of shares. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,沃爾格林-聯合博姿公司內部持股不到1%。然而,內部人士可能通過更復雜的結構間接持有利益。這是一家大公司,所以即使持有較小比例的利益也可以在董事會和股東之間建立聯繫。在這種情況下,內部人士持有價值3000萬美元的股票。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣重要。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否一直在買入或賣出股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆-包括散戶投資者-擁有該公司的 21% 的股份,因此不能輕易忽略。儘管該群體不能決定公司的方向,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 17%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們的數據顯示,私人公司持有公司股份的17%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人士通過持有私人公司的股份而對某家上市公司產生興趣,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何籠統的結論,但值得注意的是這是進一步研究的一個領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Walgreens Boots Alliance that you should be aware of.

我發現研究公司的真正所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已確定沃爾格林-聯合博姿存在2個警示信號,你應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論