share_log

With 53% Ownership, CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAVA) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 53% Ownership, CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAVA) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

擁有53%股權的CAVA集團(紐交所:CAVA)得到了強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  09/21 03:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in CAVA Group implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構在CAVA Group持有的大量股份意味着他們對該公司的股價有重要影響力。
  • 共有12名投資者擁有公司的大部分股權,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

If you want to know who really controls CAVA Group, Inc. (NYSE:CAVA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 53% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想了解誰真正控制CAVA集團(紐交所代碼:CAVA),那麼您需要查看其股份登記簿的構成。在持有53%股權的機構組合掌握着最大的份額。換句話說,該組合面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of CAVA Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解CAVA集團每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:CAVA Ownership Breakdown September 20th 2024
紐約證券交易所: CAVA 所有權分佈 2024年9月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CAVA Group?

機構持股有何啓示?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that CAVA Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CAVA Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到CAVA集團確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的相當一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,並且他們看好。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在它們陷入「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會爭相迅速拋售股票。在一個沒有成長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。你可以在下面看到CAVA集團的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更多。

big
NYSE:CAVA Earnings and Revenue Growth September 20th 2024
紐交所:CAVA盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月20日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in CAVA Group. Artal Group S.A. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.3% by the third-largest shareholder. In addition, we found that Brett Schulman, the CEO has 0.9% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大影響力。對於CAVA集團,對沖基金並不持有很多股份。Artal Group S.A.目前是公司最大的股東,持有15%的流通股份。作爲對比,第二大股東持有約7.1%的流通股份,第三大股東持有5.3%的流通股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Brett Schulman所擁有的股份佔有0.9%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 12 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過一些調查,我們發現前12名股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,表明沒有單一股東對公司具有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of CAVA Group

CAVA Group內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in CAVA Group, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$251m. we sometimes take an interest in whether they have been buying or selling.

股東可能會有興趣了解,CAVA Group, Inc.的內部持有股份。內部持有者持有價值2.51億美元的重要股份。我們有時會對他們是否一直在買入或拋售感興趣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

包括散戶投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司24%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然掌控局面,但它肯定會對公司經營方式產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 21%, private equity firms could influence the CAVA Group board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

擁有21%股權的私募股權公司可能會影響CAVA集團的董事會。有些人可能喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權公司有時是激進分子,能夠追究管理層的責任。但有時候,私募股權公司會出售股權,使公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand CAVA Group better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for CAVA Group that you should be aware of.

對於擁有公司股份的不同群體,我們始終值得考慮。但要更好地了解CAVA集團,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了CAVA集團的一個警示信號,你應該注意。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論