share_log

Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:BNL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%

Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:BNL) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%

Institutional investors who own 82% of Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (紐交所:BNL) consider it a favorite.
Simply Wall St ·  09/19 18:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Broadstone Net Lease's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 鑑於機構對該股的大部分持股,Broadstone Net Lease的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 一共有11個投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

A look at the shareholders of Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:BNL) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 82% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

觀察Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE:BNL)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有影響力。機構持有82%的股份,在該公司中持股最多。也就是說,該群體在股票上漲時最有利可圖(或在經濟下滑時最虧損)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有大量的資金和研究能力,因此機構所有權往往具有相當的分量,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構在一家企業中投資的規模可視爲該企業的一項重要資產。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Broadstone Net Lease.

讓我們仔細看看股東的不同類型能告訴我們有關Broadstone Net Lease的什麼信息。

big
NYSE:BNL Ownership Breakdown September 19th 2024
紐交所:BNL所有者構成細分法2024年9月19日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Broadstone Net Lease?

機構所有權對Broadstone Net Lease有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Broadstone Net Lease already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Broadstone Net Lease, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Broadstone Net Lease的股東名冊中已有機構。實際上,他們在這家公司擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們已經研究過這支股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者在同一時間嘗試拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。所以值得檢查一下Broadstone Net Lease的過去收益軌跡(見下圖)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素要考慮。

big
NYSE:BNL Earnings and Revenue Growth September 19th 2024
紐交所:BNL收益和營業收入增長2024年9月19日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Broadstone Net Lease. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 7.8% of the stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。Hedge funds在Broadstone Net Lease中沒有太多股份。目前,Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,擁有15%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約10%和7.8%的股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

在深入挖掘後,我們發現前11名股東在該公司擁有50%的股份,這意味着沒有單一的股東對公司擁有顯著的控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Broadstone Net Lease

Broadstone Net Lease的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$51m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以報告廣泛的淨租賃股權公司內部人員擁有股份。它是一家相當大的公司,所以能夠看到一些可能具有重大意義的利益一致是很積極的。在這種情況下,他們在(當前價格下)擁有價值約5100萬美元的股份。看到內部人員的這種投資水平是好的。您可以在這裏查看內部人員最近是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in Broadstone Net Lease. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通投資者通常持有廣泛淨租賃16%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能左右決策,但它對公司運營肯定會產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Broadstone Net Lease (including 2 which are a bit unpleasant) .

我發現查看公司的實際所有人非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該了解關於Broadstone Net Lease的3個警告信號(其中2個有點不愉快)。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論