share_log

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Montauk Renewables (NASDAQ:MNTK) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Montauk Renewables(納斯達克:MNTK)的資產負債表相當健康
Simply Wall St ·  09/18 19:44

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We note that Montauk Renewables, Inc. (NASDAQ:MNTK) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過:「波動性與風險遠非同義詞。」因此,在考慮任何股票的風險時,你需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們注意到蒙托克可再生能源公司(納斯達克股票代碼:MNTK)確實在其資產負債表上有債務。但真正的問題是,這些債務是否使該公司具有風險。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無力償還債權人的債務,則存在於債權人的掌控下。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以接管企業。但是,更常見的(但仍然昂貴)局面是,一家公司必須以便宜的股價稀釋股東以控制債務。當然,對於重資產型企業,債務可以是一種重要工具。當我們審查債務水平時,首先考慮現金和債務水平。

What Is Montauk Renewables's Net Debt?

蒙托克可再生能源的淨債務是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Montauk Renewables had US$59.6m of debt in June 2024, down from US$67.4m, one year before. However, it also had US$43.1m in cash, and so its net debt is US$16.5m.

您可以點擊下面的圖表查看歷史數據,但它顯示蒙托克可再生能源在2024年6月份有5960萬美元的債務,較一年前的6740萬美元下降。然而,它也有4310萬美元的現金,所以淨債務爲1650萬美元。

big
NasdaqCM:MNTK Debt to Equity History September 18th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:MNTK的債務股本比歷史數據如下(截至2024年9月18日)

How Healthy Is Montauk Renewables' Balance Sheet?

蒙全新能源資產負債表情況如何?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Montauk Renewables had liabilities of US$42.9m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$63.7m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$43.1m as well as receivables valued at US$22.5m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$41.1m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

通過最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到蒙全新能源在12個月內有4290萬美元的負債,超過12個月的負債爲6370萬美元。與此同時,它有4310萬美元的現金以及在12個月內到期的應收賬款,價值2250萬美元。因此,它的負債總額超過現金和短期應收賬款的4110萬美元。

Of course, Montauk Renewables has a market capitalization of US$641.6m, so these liabilities are probably manageable. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

當然,蒙全新能源的市值爲64160萬美元,所以這些負債可能是可以應對的。話雖如此,我們應該繼續監控它的資產負債表,以防情況惡化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

通過查看公司的淨債務與利息、稅、折舊、攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)之比以及它的利息費用(利息覆蓋率)可以衡量一個公司的債務負擔與收益能力。因此,我們考慮將債務與有無計算折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對比。

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 0.32 and interest cover of 4.9 times, it seems to us that Montauk Renewables is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. So we'd recommend keeping a close eye on the impact financing costs are having on the business. Montauk Renewables grew its EBIT by 4.3% in the last year. Whilst that hardly knocks our socks off it is a positive when it comes to debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Montauk Renewables's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

從它的淨債務與息稅前利潤(EBITDA)比率爲0.32和利息覆蓋倍數爲4.9來看,蒙全新能源在我們看來可能是以相當合理的方式運用債務。因此,我們建議密切關注融資成本對業務的影響。蒙全新能源在過去一年中的EBIt增長了4.3%。雖然這並不令人驚歎,但在債務方面是一個積極的因素。資產負債表顯然是你分析債務時要重點關注的領域。但最重要的是未來的盈利,這將決定蒙全新能源能否保持健康的資產負債表。因此,如果你想知道專業人士的看法,你可能會對分析師的盈利預測免費報告感興趣。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. In the last three years, Montauk Renewables's free cash flow amounted to 33% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

總而言之,公司只能用現金支付債務,而不能用會計利潤。因此,了解有多少EBIt得到了自由現金流的支持是值得的。在過去的三年中,蒙全新能源的自由現金流僅佔其EBIt的33%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不好。

Our View

我們的觀點

When it comes to the balance sheet, the standout positive for Montauk Renewables was the fact that it seems able handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, confidently. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit to convert EBIT to free cash flow. Considering this range of data points, we think Montauk Renewables is in a good position to manage its debt levels. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. Above most other metrics, we think its important to track how fast earnings per share is growing, if at all. If you've also come to that realization, you're in luck, because today you can view this interactive graph of Montauk Renewables's earnings per share history for free.

在資產負債表方面,Montauk Renewables的傑出之處在於,根據其EBITDA,似乎能夠自信地處理債務。然而,我們的其他觀察並不那麼令人振奮。例如,似乎需要努力一番才能將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲Montauk Renewables能夠良好地管理其債務水平。話雖如此,負擔相當沉重,我們建議股東們密切關注。相比大多數其他指標,我們認爲跟蹤每股收益的增長速度有重要性,無論如何。如果您也意識到了這一點,那麼您很幸運,因爲今天您可以免費查看Montauk Renewables每股收益歷史的交互式圖表。

When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.

說到底,有時候更容易集中精力關注根本不需要債務的公司。讀者可以免費訪問零淨債務增長股票列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論