share_log

With 42% Ownership in Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROOT), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 42% Ownership in Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROOT), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

在Root,Inc. (納斯達克:ROOT)中擁有42%的股權,機構投資者對這個業務有很多投入。
Simply Wall St ·  09/18 19:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Root's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • 21% of Root is held by insiders
  • 鑑於機構在股票中持有大量股份,Root的股價可能會受到它們交易決策的影響
  • 前八大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 公司21%的股份由內部持有者持有。

Every investor in Root, Inc. (NASDAQ:ROOT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Root股票的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東團體。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司42%的股權,換句話說,該團體面臨的上漲潛力(或下行風險)最大。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$77m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 289%.

上週,該公司的市值增加了7700萬美元,這對機構投資者來說是個好消息。上週的收益將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前爲289%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Root, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究一下Root的每一類所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:ROOT Ownership Breakdown September 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:ROOt所有權分佈於2024年9月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Root?

機構所有權對Root有什麼影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Root does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Root, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到Root確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司股票的一部分。這表明在專業投資者中具有一定的信譽。但僅憑這個事實我們不能完全依賴,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查Root的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:ROOT Earnings and Revenue Growth September 18th 2024
NasdaqGS:ROOt 2024年9月18日盈利和營收增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Root. The company's largest shareholder is Ribbit Management Company, LLC, with ownership of 13%. With 9.6% and 7.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Christopher Olsen and Alexander Timm are the second and third largest shareholders. Alexander Timm, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

我們注意到對於Root而言,對沖基金並沒有意義的投資。該公司最大的股東是Ribbit Management Company, LLC,持有13%的股權。 Christopher Olsen和Alexander Timm分別持有9.6%和7.5%的流通股份,是第二和第三大股東。 Alexander Timm是第三大股東,同時也擔任董事會主席。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步了解,前8大股東持有該公司約51%的註冊股份,這意味着除了更大的股東外,還有一些較小的股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Root

Root的內部持有。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Root, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$603m, and insiders have US$125m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有合理比例的Root, Inc.股份。其市值僅爲60300萬美元,內部人員名下持有價值12500萬美元的股份。這可能意味着創始人仍然持有大量股份。您可以點擊這裏查看是否他們一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Root. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有19%的股份,由個人投資者主導的普通公衆在Root擁有一定影響力。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以左右政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With an ownership of 18%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股權投資公司擁有18%的股權,因此可以在塑造企業策略方面發揮作用,重點是價值創造。 一些投資者可能會因此而感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵幫助市場看到公司價值的策略。另一方面,這些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Root has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如說風險 - Root有3個警示標誌,我們認爲你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論