share_log

We Think Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

We Think Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt

我們認爲克利夫蘭克裏夫(紐交所: CLF)在債務方面存在一些風險
Simply Wall St ·  09/16 23:19

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

波克夏·哈撒韋所支持的外部基金經理、李錄(Li Lu)在說到「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性資本損失」時毫不諱言。因此,當你考慮一支股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。重要的是,克利夫蘭克裏夫公司(紐交所:CLF)確實有債務。但更重要的問題是:這些債務帶來了多大的風險呢?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無力償還債權人,那麼它就處在他們的控制下。在最糟糕的情況下,如果公司無法償還債權人,它可能會破產。雖然這種情況並不常見,但我們經常看到負債累累的公司因爲債權人強迫它們以低價發行股票來籌集資本從而永久稀釋股東權益。然而,通過取代稀釋,債務可以成爲需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業的一種極好的工具。在考慮一家公司的債務水平時,第一步是同時考慮其現金和債務。

What Is Cleveland-Cliffs's Net Debt?

克利夫蘭克裏夫的淨債務是多少呢?

As you can see below, Cleveland-Cliffs had US$3.53b of debt at June 2024, down from US$3.99b a year prior. However, it also had US$110.0m in cash, and so its net debt is US$3.42b.

如下所示,克利夫蘭克裏夫在2024年6月擁有3.53億美元的債務,較一年前的3.99億美元減少。然而,它也有1,100萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲3.42億美元。

big
NYSE:CLF Debt to Equity History September 16th 2024
紐交所:CLF資產負債率歷史數據(2024年9月16日)

How Healthy Is Cleveland-Cliffs' Balance Sheet?

克利夫蘭克裏夫公司的資產負債表情況怎麼樣?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Cleveland-Cliffs had liabilities of US$3.32b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$6.24b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$110.0m and US$1.77b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$7.67b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

從最新的資產負債表中,我們可以看到克利夫蘭克裏夫的短期債務爲US $ 3.32億,超過一年的長期債務爲US $ 6.24億。 另一方面,其現金爲1.1億美元,應收賬款爲1.77億美元。 因此,其債務總額比其現金和短期應收款組合高出76.7億美元。

When you consider that this deficiency exceeds the company's US$5.57b market capitalization, you might well be inclined to review the balance sheet intently. Hypothetically, extremely heavy dilution would be required if the company were forced to pay down its liabilities by raising capital at the current share price.

考慮到這個不足超過公司市值555億美元,您可能會傾向於仔細審核資產負債表。 如果公司被迫以當前股價籌集資本償還債務,理論上將需要大量稀釋。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Cleveland-Cliffs has net debt worth 2.1 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 2.6 times the interest expense. In large part that's due to the company's significant depreciation and amortisation charges, which arguably mean its EBITDA is a very generous measure of earnings, and its debt may be more of a burden than it first appears. We saw Cleveland-Cliffs grow its EBIT by 4.0% in the last twelve months. Whilst that hardly knocks our socks off it is a positive when it comes to debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Cleveland-Cliffs can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

克利夫蘭克裏夫的淨債務值爲EBITDA的2.1倍,這並不太多,但其利息覆蓋率看起來有點偏低,EBIT只有利息費用的2.6倍。 這在很大程度上歸因於公司的大幅折舊和攤銷費用,可以說EBITDA是一種非常慷慨的盈利衡量標準,而其債務可能比表面看起來更加沉重。 我們看到克利夫蘭克裏夫在過去的十二個月中EBIT增長了4.0%。 儘管這並沒有讓我們興奮不已,但對於債務而言這是一個積極的表現。 毫無疑問我們從資產負債表中了解到最多關於債務的信息。 但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定克利夫蘭克裏夫是否能夠長期加強資產負債表。 因此,如果您想知道專業人士的觀點,您可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Cleveland-Cliffs recorded free cash flow worth a fulsome 89% of its EBIT, which is stronger than we'd usually expect. That positions it well to pay down debt if desirable to do so.

最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不能解決問題。因此,我們明顯需要看看EBIt是否導致相應的自由現金流。在過去三年裏,克利夫蘭克裏夫錄得的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIt的豐厚89%,這比我們通常預期的要強。這使其有能力償還債務,如果需要的話。

Our View

我們的觀點

Cleveland-Cliffs's level of total liabilities and interest cover definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But the good news is it seems to be able to convert EBIT to free cash flow with ease. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Cleveland-Cliffs is taking some risks with its use of debt. So while that leverage does boost returns on equity, we wouldn't really want to see it increase from here. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. We've identified 3 warning signs with Cleveland-Cliffs (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

克利夫蘭克裏夫的總負債水平和利息覆蓋確實在我們看來是個負擔。但好消息是,它似乎可以輕鬆地將EBIt轉化爲自由現金流。當我們考慮所有討論過的因素時,我們認爲克利夫蘭克裏夫在債務使用方面存在一些風險。因此,雖然槓桿確實提高了股本回報率,但我們不希望看到其進一步增加。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。但最終,每家公司都可能存在超越資產負債表的風險。我們已經發現了克利夫蘭克裏夫的3個警示信號(至少1個不應被忽視),了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論