share_log

Adobe Inc. (NASDAQ:ADBE) Down to US$238b Market Cap, but Institutional Owners May Not Be as Affected After a Year of 0.8% Returns

Adobe Inc. (NASDAQ:ADBE) Down to US$238b Market Cap, but Institutional Owners May Not Be as Affected After a Year of 0.8% Returns

adobe公司(納斯達克:ADBE)市值下降至2380億美元,但機構持有者在0.8%的回報率後可能不會受到太大影響
Simply Wall St ·  09/16 23:11

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Adobe's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 45% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 考慮到機構在Adobe的股票持倉較大,其股票價格可能會對機構的交易決策產生影響。
  • 該公司共有25位投資者,持股比例爲45%。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Adobe Inc. (NASDAQ:ADBE) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 85% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

分析Adobe Inc. (NASDAQ:ADBE)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。機構擁有該公司85%的股權,是公司中持股最多的群體。如果股票上漲,機構將最有利可圖(或者如果出現下行的情況,虧損的最多)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$238b last week. However, the 0.8% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

公司市值上週下跌至2380億美元后,機構投資者受到了最大的影響。然而,0.8%的股東一年回報可能有助於減輕他們的痛苦。但他們可能會對未來的虧損保持謹慎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Adobe, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究adobe的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:ADBE Ownership Breakdown September 16th 2024
納斯達克:adobe 2024年9月16日的所有權分解

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Adobe?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Adobe的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Adobe does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Adobe's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,adobe確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司的股票的一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下adobe的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqGS:ADBE Earnings and Revenue Growth September 16th 2024
2024年9月16日Adobe的盈利和營業收入增長的納斯達克指數市值

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Adobe is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.3%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.7% and 4.5% of the stock.

投資者應注意,事實上,機構持有該公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要的權力。adobe並不被對沖基金所擁有。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,持有9.3%的股份。與之相比,第二和第三大股東分別持有約8.7%和4.5%的股份。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Adobe

Adobe內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Adobe Inc. in their own names. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$374m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們的數據表明,adobe公司的內部人員在自己的名下擁有的股份不到1%。由於公司規模如此之大,我們不指望內部人員擁有大量的股份。總體來說,他們擁有37100萬美元的股票。在這種情況下,更有趣的是看看這些內部人員是在買入還是賣出股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

總體來說,公衆股東,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能完全掌控公司,但肯定對公司經營產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Adobe , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現了解一家公司的真正股東非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。比如說,投資風險經常存在。我們已經發現了adobe的一個警示信號,並了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論