share_log

With 80% Institutional Ownership, U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USB) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

With 80% Institutional Ownership, U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USB) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns

因爲有80%的機構所有權,美國合衆銀行(紐交所:USB)是大佬們的最愛。
Simply Wall St ·  09/16 23:02

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, U.S. Bancorp's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 鑑於機構對該股的大量持股,美國合衆銀行的股價可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 總共有25個投資者擁有公司的多數股份,佔有50%的所有權
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of U.S. Bancorp (NYSE:USB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 80% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解誰真正掌控着美國合衆銀行(紐交所:USB),對該公司的所有權結構進行了解非常重要。持有該公司最多股份的是機構,準確地說,佔據了大約80%的股份。換句話說,該機構面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about U.S. Bancorp.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於美國合衆銀行的什麼。

big
NYSE:USB Ownership Breakdown September 16th 2024
紐交所:美國合衆銀行所有權分佈2024年9月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About U.S. Bancorp?

機構持有的股份告訴我們U.S. Bancorp的情況如何?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

U.S. Bancorp already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at U.S. Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

美國合衆銀行已經有機構持有股份。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當大的股份。這表明公司在投資社區中擁有一定程度的信譽。然而,依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證最好還是謹慎一些。他們也有時會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下美國合衆銀行下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:USB Earnings and Revenue Growth September 16th 2024
紐交所:USb的收益和營業收入增長2024年9月16日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in U.S. Bancorp. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.7% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 4.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能共同影響董事會決策。對於美國合衆銀行,對沖基金持有的股份不多。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是持股8.7%的最大股東。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有8.1%和4.3%的流通股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 25 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前25位股東在公司中擁有50%的股份,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司具有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of U.S. Bancorp

U.S. Bancorp股權內部所有制。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of U.S. Bancorp. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$138m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部持有者持有美國合衆銀行不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此很難想象內部持有者擁有大量公司股份。儘管他們持有的股份不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共持有價值13800萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到至少有一些內部持有是件好事,但也許值得檢查一下這些內部持有者是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有公司的20%股份,因此不能輕易忽略。雖然這個群體不能必然佔據主導地位,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I always like to check for a history of revenue growth. You can too, by accessing this free chart of historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我總是喜歡查看營業收入增長的歷史記錄,你也可以免費訪問這個詳細圖表中的歷史營收和收益圖表。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論