share_log

Sapiens International Corporation N.V.'s (NASDAQ:SPNS) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies With 44% Ownership, Institutions Own 40%

Sapiens International Corporation N.V.'s (NASDAQ:SPNS) Largest Shareholders Are Public Companies With 44% Ownership, Institutions Own 40%

Sapiens International Corporation N.V.(納斯達克股票代碼:SPNS)的最大股東是公共公司,擁有44%的股權,機構擁有40%的股權。
Simply Wall St ·  09/16 21:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by public companies in Sapiens International indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • The top 3 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Institutions own 40% of Sapiens International
  • 納斯達克公司參股sapiens international的大比例股權表明,它們共同對管理和商業策略有更大發言權。
  • 前三大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
  • 機構擁有sapiens international的40%股份。

A look at the shareholders of Sapiens International Corporation N.V. (NASDAQ:SPNS) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 44% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看sapiens international股份有限公司(納斯達克:SPNS)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最有影響力。 公司擁有44%的股權,公衆公司擁有該公司的最大股份。 換句話說,該集團面臨的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)最大。

Meanwhile, institutions make up 40% of the company's shareholders. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.

同時,機構佔了公司股東的40%。 機構通常會持有大公司的股票,而我們預計會看到內部人員佔小公司的可觀比例。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Sapiens International.

讓我們仔細研究一下不同類型的股東對Sapiens International的影響。

big
NasdaqGS:SPNS Ownership Breakdown September 16th 2024
NasdaqGS:SPNS所有權細分於2024年9月16日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sapiens International?

機構所有權對Sapiens International有何影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Sapiens International already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Sapiens International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Sapiens International已經在股東註冊表上有機構。事實上,他們在公司擁有相當大的股份。 這表明在專業投資者中還具有一定的可信度。 但是,我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤投資,就像每個人一樣。 當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在他們參與的'人滿爲患的交易'的風險。 當這種交易出現問題時,多個交易方可能會競相快速拋售股票。 在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。 您可以查看Sapiens International的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事一直沒有完全結束。

big
NasdaqGS:SPNS Earnings and Revenue Growth September 16th 2024
納斯達克:SPNS收益和營業收入增長2024年9月16日

Sapiens International is not owned by hedge funds. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. is currently the largest shareholder, with 44% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.7% and 2.9% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Roni Al-Dor directly holds 1.6% of the total shares outstanding.

Sapiens International不是由對沖基金持有。Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.目前是最大的股東,持有44%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約4.7%和2.9%的股份。此外,該公司的CEO Roni Al-Dor直接持有總流通股的1.6%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Sapiens International

Sapiens International的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Sapiens International Corporation N.V.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$31m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到Sapiens International Corporation N.V.的內部持有股份。這是一家大公司,所以看到這種程度的一致性是好事。內部人持有價值3100萬美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。大多數人會說這顯示了股東和董事會的利益一致性。不過,還是值得檢查一下這些內部人是否一直在賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Sapiens International. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通大衆,通常是個人投資者,在Sapiens International擁有15%的股份。儘管這個群體不能決定一切,但它肯定對公司的運營產生了真正的影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 44% of Sapiens International stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

目前,公開公司擁有sapiens international股票的44%。我們不能確定,但很可能這是一個戰略性的股份。這些企業可能相似,或者進行合作。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Sapiens International better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that Sapiens International is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

值得考慮的是,不同的群體擁有公司的股份。但要更好地了解sapiens international,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。請注意,在我們的投資分析中,sapiens international出現了一個警示標誌,你應該知道...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論