share_log

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders at Prairie Operating Co. (NASDAQ:PROP) Are the Largest Shareholders; Own 65% Shares

In Spite of Recent Selling, Insiders at Prairie Operating Co. (NASDAQ:PROP) Are the Largest Shareholders; Own 65% Shares

儘管最近有銷售,但Prairie Operating Co.(納斯達克:PROP)的內部人仍是最大的股東,擁有65%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  09/15 22:48

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Prairie Operating implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 57% ownership
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • Prairie Operating的重要內部控制意味着對公司發展有着既得利益
  • 該公司由2位投資者持有57%的股權。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Prairie Operating Co. (NASDAQ:PROP) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 65% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看Prairie Operating Co.(NASDAQ:PROP)的股東可以告訴我們哪一組最有權勢。持有最大股份的是個別內部股東,佔有65%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將最受益(或者如果出現下跌,則最受損)。

Despite recent sales, insiders own the most shares in the company. As a result, they stand to gain the most after the stock gained 40% in the past week.

儘管最近有銷售,但內部人擁有公司中最多的股份。因此,在股票上週漲了40%後,他們將獲得最多的收益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Prairie Operating.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們有關Prairie Operating的什麼信息。

big
NasdaqCM:PROP Ownership Breakdown September 15th 2024
納斯達克資本市場: PROP所有權拆分2024年9月15日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Prairie Operating?

機構所有權告訴我們有關Prairie Operating的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Prairie Operating does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Prairie Operating's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Prairie Operating確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司股份的相當大一部分。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度。然而,在依賴所謂由機構投資者帶來的認可時最好保持警惕。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有某股票時,總會存在它們參與了一個「擁擠的交易」的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下方看到Prairie Operating的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住故事總是更多的。

big
NasdaqCM:PROP Earnings and Revenue Growth September 15th 2024
PROP的收入和營業收入於2024年9月15日增長。

It would appear that 7.3% of Prairie Operating shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that Gregory O'Neill is the largest shareholder with 50% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.3% and 5.5% of the stock. Edward Kovalik, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.

看起來,7.3%的Prairie Operating股份由對沖基金控制。有趣的是,對沖基金可能非常活躍和激進。許多對沖基金尋找能夠推高股票價格的中期催化劑。我們的數據顯示,Gregory O'Neill是持有50%未流通股份的最大股東。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約7.3%和5.5%的股票。第三大股東Edward Kovalik也恰巧擔任董事會主席的頭銜。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前2名股東擁有該公司的大部分所有權,這意味着他們足夠強大,可以影響公司的決策。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

普通公衆持有北方銅業的23%股份。雖然這個群體不能決定公司的命運,但它肯定會對公司運營方式產生真正的影響。

Insider Ownership Of Prairie Operating

Prairie Operating的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Prairie Operating Co.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own US$141m worth of shares in the US$216m company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息顯示,內部人士擁有Prairie Operating Co.超過一半的股份。這使他們有效控制着公司。這意味着他們在總價值21600萬美元的公司中擁有14100萬美元的股份。這是相當有意義的。多數人可能會樂於看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望免費了解他們是買入還是賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆(包括散戶投資者)擁有該公司的13%股份,因此不容忽視。雖然該群體不能決定,但肯定會對公司的運營產生實際影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 6.6%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們可以看到私人公司擁有已發行股份的6.6%。值得更深入地研究一下。如果相關方,如內部人員,在其中一傢俬人公司中擁有利益,則應在年度報告中披露。私人公司可能對該公司也有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 6 warning signs for Prairie Operating you should be aware of, and 3 of them are concerning.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如:我們發現 Prairie Operating 公司有6個警示信號,您應該注意,其中有3個令人擔憂。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論