share_log

Institutional Investors Control 87% of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 3.6%

Institutional Investors Control 87% of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 3.6%

機構投資者控制着亞歷山大和鮑德溫公司(紐交所:ALEX)的87%股權,股價上漲3.6%後,上週受到回報。
Simply Wall St ·  09/14 22:10

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Alexander & Baldwin's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 鑑於機構在該股票中持有大量股份,亞歷山大與鮑德溫的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 6個投資者擁有51%的普通股份。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 87% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

爲了了解誰真正控制着Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX),了解企業的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到機構擁有公司的大部分股份,佔有87%。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$50m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 19%.

機構投資者的情況正在好轉,上週公司的市值增加了5000萬美元。上週的收益將進一步提高股東的一年回報率,目前爲19%。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Alexander & Baldwin.

在下面的圖表中,我們更詳細地研究了亞歷山大和鮑德溫的不同所有權群體。

big
NYSE:ALEX Ownership Breakdown September 14th 2024
紐交所:ALEX 所有權分佈 2024年9月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alexander & Baldwin?

機構所有權對Alexander & Baldwin有何影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Alexander & Baldwin already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Alexander & Baldwin's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

亞歷山大和鮑德溫已經有機構在股東名冊上。事實上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這支股票,他們喜歡它。但就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能出錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看亞歷山大和鮑德溫的歷史收入數據。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NYSE:ALEX Earnings and Revenue Growth September 14th 2024
紐交所:ALEX的盈利和營業收入增長截至2024年9月14日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Alexander & Baldwin. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 18% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 16% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.6% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應注意,實際上有超過一半的公司股份由機構持有,因此他們可以共同發揮重大影響力。我們注意到對於亞歷山大和鮑德溫,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德公司是最大的股東,持有18%的流通股。作爲對比,第二大股東持有約16%的流通股,第三大股東擁有5.6%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Alexander & Baldwin

Alexander & Baldwin的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can see that insiders own shares in Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$19m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們可以看到,Alexander&Baldwin,Inc.的內部投資者持有股份。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能具有意義的一致性通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們持有價值約1900萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部投資者有這種投資水平是件好事。您可以在這裏檢查,看看這些內部投資者最近是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司12%的股權,因此不能被忽視。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以爲他們爭取政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Alexander & Baldwin better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Alexander & Baldwin (of which 1 can't be ignored!) you should know about.

在考慮一個公司的時候,了解不同的股東群體是很有價值的。但是要更好地了解亞歷山大和鮑德溫,我們需要考慮很多其他因素,比如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現了亞歷山大和鮑德溫的3個警告信號(其中一個不能忽視!)你應該知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論