share_log

Institutional Investors Control 82% of Constellation Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:CEG) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 7.9%

Institutional Investors Control 82% of Constellation Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:CEG) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 7.9%

機構投資者共控制着康斯特拉能源公司(NASDAQ:CEG)的82%股份,並在上週股票上漲7.9%後獲得回報。
Simply Wall St ·  03:57

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Constellation Energy's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 9 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 鑑於機構在股票中所持有的大部分股份,康斯泰雷能源的股價可能容易受到它們交易決策的影響
  • 前9大股東持有該公司50%的股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Constellation Energy Corporation (NASDAQ:CEG), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 82% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正控制着康斯泰雷能源公司(NASDAQ:CEG),了解公司的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到機構擁有公司82%的所有權。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該機構將獲益最大(或者如果出現下行,損失也將最大)。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 7.9% last week. The one-year return on investment is currently 70% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.

作爲結果,機構投資者在上週公司股價上漲7.9%後獲得了最豐厚的回報。投資一年回報率目前爲70%,上週的收益將受到更多的歡迎。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Constellation Energy, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Constellation Energy的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:CEG Ownership Breakdown September 13th 2024
納斯達克GS: CEG所有權分解2024年9月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Constellation Energy?

機構所有權告訴我們什麼有關Constellation Energy?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Constellation Energy. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Constellation Energy, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所見,機構投資者在Constellation Energy擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。但是,最好謹慎依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售一隻股票,股價大幅下跌也是常見現象。因此,值得檢查Constellation Energy的過去收益軌跡(如下所示)。當然,還要記住考慮其他因素。

big
NasdaqGS:CEG Earnings and Revenue Growth September 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:CEG第四季度的營收和收入增長在2024年9月13日公佈

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Constellation Energy. The company's largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company, with ownership of 12%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 12% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。我們注意到對冠能能源幾乎沒有一個有意義的投資的對沖基金。該公司最大的股東是資本研究與管理公司,持有12%的股權。爲了背景資料,第二大股東持有約12%的流通股,第三大股東持有6.9%的股權。

We did some more digging and found that 9 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進行了更多挖掘,發現前九大股東佔註冊資本的大約50%,這意味着除了較大的股東外,還有少數小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Constellation Energy

冠能能源的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Constellation Energy Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$81m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士擁有康斯泰能源公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,所以看到內部人士擁有公司的很大比例是很令人驚訝的。雖然他們的持股比例不到1%,但我們可以看到董事會成員共同擁有價值8100萬美元的股份(按照當前價格計算)。看到董事會成員擁有股份是好事,但也值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Constellation Energy. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆,通常是個體投資者,持有康斯泰能源18%的股權。儘管持股比例相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Constellation Energy that you should be aware of before investing here.

我發現查看公司的實際持有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Constellation Energy的2個警示標誌,在在這裏投資之前你應該意識到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論