share_log

With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:LECO) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 81% Ownership of the Shares, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:LECO) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

林肯電氣控股有限公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LECO)擁有81%的股權,受機構投資者的嚴重控制。
Simply Wall St ·  09/13 19:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lincoln Electric Holdings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 19 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 考慮到機構在股票中佔據的大股份,Lincoln Electric Holdings的股價可能受到他們交易決策的影響
  • 前19名股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:LECO) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看看Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: LECO)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有權力。 持有最大股份的群體是機構,佔據81%的所有權。 換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構業主擁有巨額資源和流動性資產,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的影響力,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於一家公司通常被視爲一種理想的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lincoln Electric Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解林肯電氣控股的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:LECO Ownership Breakdown September 13th 2024
NasdaqGS:LECO所有權拆分2024年9月13日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lincoln Electric Holdings?

機構持股對林肯電氣控股公司有什麼影響?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lincoln Electric Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lincoln Electric Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所見,機構投資者在林肯電氣控股中持有相當大的股份。這表明專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人都會做一樣。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出某隻股票,那麼股價大幅下跌也就不足爲奇了。因此,值得檢查林肯電氣控股的過去盈利軌跡(下方)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:LECO Earnings and Revenue Growth September 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:LECO收入和營業收入增長2024年9月13日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lincoln Electric Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 10.0%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.8% by the third-largest shareholder.

由於機構投資者持有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能不得不關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對於Lincoln Electric Holdings而言,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group,Inc.,持有10%的股份。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約9.2%的流通股份,第三大股東持有4.8%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

觀察股東登記表,我們可以看到51%的所有權由前19位股東控制,這意味着沒有單一的股東掌握了多數股權所有權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Lincoln Electric Holdings

林肯電氣控股公司的內部持股情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$63m of stock. Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部持有人擁有Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.不到1%的股份。 由於公司規模龐大,我們不會指望內部持有人擁有很大比例的股票。總體來看,他們共擁有6300萬美元的股票。 最近買賣股票同樣重要,您可以單擊此處查看內部持有人是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 18% stake in Lincoln Electric Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,通常指個人投資者,持有Lincoln Electric Holdings 18%的股份。 儘管這個群體不一定能左右公司的決策,但肯定會對公司的經營產生真正影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Lincoln Electric Holdings has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,風險是一個例子-林肯電氣控股有1個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論