share_log

After a Year of 0.9% Returns, Proto Labs, Inc.'s (NYSE:PRLB) Share Price Drop Last Week May Have Less of an Impact on Institutional Investors

After a Year of 0.9% Returns, Proto Labs, Inc.'s (NYSE:PRLB) Share Price Drop Last Week May Have Less of an Impact on Institutional Investors

經歷了0.9%的回報一年之後,Proto Labs, Inc. (紐交所:PRLB)的股價上週下跌可能對機構投資者的影響較小
Simply Wall St ·  09/07 22:20

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Proto Labs' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 機構持有量顯著高,意味着Proto Labs的股價對它們的交易行爲非常敏感
  • 總共有8個投資者擁有該公司的52%所有權。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

Every investor in Proto Labs, Inc. (NYSE:PRLB) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Proto Labs, Inc. (NYSE:PRLB)的每位投資者都應意識到最強大的股東群體。而持有最大股份的是在機構,擁有87%的所有權。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或者下行風險)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 7.8% in value last week. However, the 0.9% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在他們的投資上虧錢,尤其是機構投資者上週看到其持有股票價值下跌了7.8%的時候。但是,對股東來說,1年的回報率爲0.9%可能有所減輕他們的痛苦。然而,我們會假設他們會對未來的疲軟保持警惕。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Proto Labs, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Proto Labs的每個股東類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:PRLB Ownership Breakdown September 7th 2024
紐交所(NYSE):PRLb所有權分佈(2024年9月7日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Proto Labs?

機構所有權給我們關於Proto Labs的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Proto Labs does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Proto Labs, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到Proto Labs確實擁有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股票。這表明專業投資者們對其有一定的信任。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯下壞投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,股價下跌是很常見的。因此,值得檢查Proto Labs過去的盈利軌跡(如下所示)。當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
NYSE:PRLB Earnings and Revenue Growth September 7th 2024
紐交所:PRLb收益和營業收入增長2024年9月7日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Proto Labs. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 17% of shares outstanding. With 12% and 7.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Disciplined Growth Investors, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可能會共同對董事會的決策產生強烈影響。我們注意到對Proto Labs的投資不重要的對沖基金。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是BlackRock,持有17%的股份。第二和第三大股東分別是The Vanguard Group,持有12%和Disciplined Growth Investors,持有7.7%的股份。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步挖掘發現,前8大股東佔該公司註冊股份的約52%,這意味着除了大股東之外,還有少數小股東,這樣可以在一定程度上平衡彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Proto Labs

Proto Labs的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Proto Labs, Inc. in their own names. It seems the board members have no more than US$3.5m worth of shares in the US$709m company. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

我們的數據表明,內部人士僅以自己的名義持有Proto Labs, Inc.不到1%的股份。 董事會成員在這家價值7,0900萬美元的公司中持有不超過350萬美元的股份。 許多人傾向於希望看到持有更多股份的董事會。 下一步可以看一下這個內部買賣的免費摘要。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括零售投資者在內的普通公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。儘管該公司擁有相當大的股權,但如果決策與其他大股東的決策不同步,這可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Proto Labs , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我覺得查看一個公司到底是誰在擁有非常有趣,但是爲了更全面的了解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,要考慮到一直存在的投資風險。我們已經發現了1個關於proto labs的警告信號,了解它們應該是你投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論