share_log

Declining Stock and Decent Financials: Is The Market Wrong About Kforce Inc. (NYSE:KFRC)?

Declining Stock and Decent Financials: Is The Market Wrong About Kforce Inc. (NYSE:KFRC)?

股票下跌和良好的財務狀況:市場對Kforce Inc.(紐交所:KFRC)是否判斷錯誤?
Simply Wall St ·  09/07 20:19

It is hard to get excited after looking at Kforce's (NYSE:KFRC) recent performance, when its stock has declined 4.7% over the past week. However, stock prices are usually driven by a company's financials over the long term, which in this case look pretty respectable. Particularly, we will be paying attention to Kforce's ROE today.

看着 k力(紐交所:KFRC) 近期的表現之後,很難感到興奮,因爲該股在過去一週下跌了4.7%。然而,股價通常受到公司的長期財務狀況的影響,在這種情況下,看起來相當可觀。特別是,今天我們將關注 k力 的roe。

Return on Equity or ROE is a test of how effectively a company is growing its value and managing investors' money. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.

ROE,即淨資產收益率,測試一家公司有效增加價值和管理股東資金的能力。換句話說,它揭示了公司將股東投資轉化爲利潤的成功程度。

How To Calculate Return On Equity?

如何計算股東權益報酬率?

The formula for return on equity is:

權益回報率的計算公式是:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

淨資產收益率 = 淨利潤(從持續經營中獲得)÷ 股東權益

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Kforce is:

因此,根據上述公式,k力的roe爲:

31% = US$51m ÷ US$167m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2024).

31% = 5100萬美元 ÷ 16700萬美元(基於截至2024年6月的過去十二個月)。

The 'return' is the profit over the last twelve months. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.31 in profit.

「回報率」是指過去12個月的利潤。這種概念化的方法是,對於每1美元的股東資本,公司賺了0.31美元的利潤。

Why Is ROE Important For Earnings Growth?

ROE爲什麼對淨利潤增長很重要?

Thus far, we have learned that ROE measures how efficiently a company is generating its profits. Based on how much of its profits the company chooses to reinvest or "retain", we are then able to evaluate a company's future ability to generate profits. Assuming everything else remains unchanged, the higher the ROE and profit retention, the higher the growth rate of a company compared to companies that don't necessarily bear these characteristics.

到目前爲止,我們已經知道ROE測量公司如何高效地生成利潤。基於公司選擇重新投資或「保留」其利潤的比例,我們能夠評估公司未來生成利潤的能力。假設其他所有因素保持不變,則ROE和利潤保留率越高,公司的增長率也越高,與不一定具備這些特徵的公司相比。

Kforce's Earnings Growth And 31% ROE

k力的盈利增長和31% roe

Firstly, we acknowledge that Kforce has a significantly high ROE. Secondly, even when compared to the industry average of 16% the company's ROE is quite impressive. However, for some reason, the higher returns aren't reflected in Kforce's meagre five year net income growth average of 3.6%. This is interesting as the high returns should mean that the company has the ability to generate high growth but for some reason, it hasn't been able to do so. Such a scenario is likely to take place when a company pays out a huge portion of its earnings as dividends, or is faced with competitive pressures.

首先,我們承認k力的roe非常高。其次,即使與16%的行業平均水平相比,公司的roe仍然令人印象深刻。然而,出於某種原因,較高的回報並未反映在k力五年淨利潤增長的平均水平僅爲3.6%。這很有趣,因爲高回報意味着公司有能力實現高增長,但出於某種原因,公司未能做到。這種情況很可能發生在公司將大部分收益作爲股息支付,或者面臨競爭壓力時。

Next, on comparing with the industry net income growth, we found that Kforce's reported growth was lower than the industry growth of 9.9% over the last few years, which is not something we like to see.

接下來,與行業淨利潤增長相比,我們發現k力報告的增長低於過去幾年行業的9.9%增長,這不是我們喜歡看到的。

big
NYSE:KFRC Past Earnings Growth September 7th 2024
紐交所:KFRC過去盈利增長2024年9月7日

Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. It's important for an investor to know whether the market has priced in the company's expected earnings growth (or decline). This then helps them determine if the stock is placed for a bright or bleak future. One good indicator of expected earnings growth is the P/E ratio which determines the price the market is willing to pay for a stock based on its earnings prospects. So, you may want to check if Kforce is trading on a high P/E or a low P/E, relative to its industry.

盈利增長是股票估值的一個重要因素。投資者需要了解市場是否已經將公司預期的盈利增長(或下降)定價進去。這有助於他們判斷股票未來是光明還是黯淡。一個好的預期盈利增長指標是市盈率,它根據盈利前景決定市場願意爲一支股票支付的價格。所以,你可能會想要查看Kforce的市盈率相對於其行業,是偏高還是偏低。

Is Kforce Efficiently Re-investing Its Profits?

Kforce是否有效地再投資其利潤?

Despite having a normal three-year median payout ratio of 32% (or a retention ratio of 68% over the past three years, Kforce has seen very little growth in earnings as we saw above. So there might be other factors at play here which could potentially be hampering growth. For example, the business has faced some headwinds.

儘管Kforce過去三年的中位數分紅比率爲32%(或3年來的保留比率爲68%),但我們注意到其盈利增長非常有限。所以可能有其他因素影響了其增長。例如,該業務面臨一些阻力。

Additionally, Kforce has paid dividends over a period of at least ten years, which means that the company's management is determined to pay dividends even if it means little to no earnings growth. Looking at the current analyst consensus data, we can see that the company's future payout ratio is expected to rise to 46% over the next three years. However, the company's ROE is not expected to change by much despite the higher expected payout ratio.

此外,Kforce在至少十年的時間內支付了股息,這意味着即使幾乎沒有盈利增長,該公司的管理層也決心支付股息。從當前的分析師共識數據來看,我們可以看到該公司未來的分紅比率預計將在未來三年內上升至46%。然而,雖然預期的分紅比率較高,但該公司的ROE預計不會有太大變化。

Summary

總的來說,我們對偉明環保的表現非常滿意。具體而言,我們喜歡公司以高回報率再投資了其利潤的很大一部分。當然,這導致公司的收益大幅增長。但是,最新的行業分析師預測表明,該公司的收益預計將加速增長。

Overall, we feel that Kforce certainly does have some positive factors to consider. Although, we are disappointed to see a lack of growth in earnings even in spite of a high ROE and and a high reinvestment rate. We believe that there might be some outside factors that could be having a negative impact on the business. That being so, the latest analyst forecasts show that the company will continue to see an expansion in its earnings. Are these analysts expectations based on the broad expectations for the industry, or on the company's fundamentals? Click here to be taken to our analyst's forecasts page for the company.

總的來說,我們認爲k力確實有一些值得考慮的積極因素。儘管如此,我們對於收益的增長缺乏看到一些失望,即使roe高和高再投資率。我們認爲可能有一些外部因素對業務產生了負面影響。既然如此,最新的分析師預測顯示公司的盈利將會繼續擴張。這些分析師的預期是基於整個行業的預期,還是基於公司的基本面?點擊這裏訪問我們的分析師預測頁面。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論