share_log

AI Tech Sector 'Is Not In A Bubble,' But Diversification Out Of Magnificent 7 Is Key, Goldman Sachs Says

AI Tech Sector 'Is Not In A Bubble,' But Diversification Out Of Magnificent 7 Is Key, Goldman Sachs Says

高盛表示,人工智能科技板塊'並不處於泡沫中',但是多樣化投資是高盛的關鍵。
Benzinga ·  04:56

Despite the significant growth and investor interest in artificial intelligence stocks, Goldman Sachs analysts said Thursday the sector is not in a speculative bubble, unlike previous technology booms such as the late 1990s internet bubble.

高盛分析師週四表示,儘管人工智能股票增長迅猛,投資者興趣濃厚,但該行業並不處於投機泡沫之中,不像上世紀九十年代末的互聯網泡沫那樣。

Yet the analysts highlight the importance of diversification given the high concentration risk among leading tech companies, often referred to as the "Magnificent Seven."

然而,分析師們強調了在領先的科技公司中存在投資集中風險的重要性, 這些公司通常被稱爲"科技七巨頭".

The extraordinary performance of tech stocks in recent years has been justified by their earnings, said Goldman stategist Peter Oppenheimer.

高盛策略師彼得·奧彭海默表示,科技股在近年來的表現非常出色,其收益得到了證實。

Global tech earnings per share have risen by approximately 400% since the global financial crisis, while non-tech sectors achieved a comparatively modest 25% increase, he said.

他說,全球科技股每股收益自全球金融危機以來已增長約400%,而非科技行業僅實現了相對較低的增長,僅爲25%。

"The technology sector is not in a bubble and is likely to continue to dominate returns," Oppenheimer said.

奧彭海默說:「科技行業不處於泡沫之中,有望繼續主導收益。」

Tech Valuations Remain Reasonable: Goldman Sachs

高盛:科技估值仍合理

Goldman Sachs highlights a key difference between the AI-driven rally and previous market bubbles.

高盛強調了人工智能驅動的市場反彈與以往市場泡沫之間的一個關鍵區別。

The valuations of major tech players are significantly lower than those of tech stocks during past speculative phases.

主要科技公司的估值相比過去的市場泡沫時期要低得多。

For instance, while the Magnificent Seven — Microsoft Corp. (NYSE:MSFT), Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), NVIDIA Corp. (NASDAQ:NVDA), Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) (NASDAQ:GOOGL), Amazon Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN), Meta Platforms Inc. (NASDAQ:META) and Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) — account for over 30% of the S&P 500's market weight (compared to 19% for tech giants in the 2000s), they trade at nearly half the forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio seen in the prior dot-com bubble.

例如,科技七巨頭——微軟公司(紐交所:MSFT),蘋果公司(納斯達克:AAPL),英偉達公司(納斯達克:NVDA),alphabet inc公司(納斯達克:GOOG)(納斯達克:GOOGL),亞馬遜公司(納斯達克:AMZN),meta platforms公司(納斯達克:META)和特斯拉公司(納斯達克:TSLA)——佔據了標普500指數市值的30%以上(而2000年代科技巨頭佔比19%),而它們的前瞻性市盈率(P/E)幾乎只有前期互聯網泡沫中的一半。

Company S&P 500 Weight (%) Market Cap ($bn) Forward P/E R&D (% of Revenue)
Apple 7.3 3,387 26.5 7.7
Microsoft 6.6 3,043 25.7 9.4
NVIDIA 5.7 2,649 24.1 13.2
Amazon 4.0 1,850 25.4 2.5
Alphabet 3.9 1,808 16.6 2.0
Meta Platforms 2.4 1,118 19.2 5.5
Tesla 1.4 672 55.4 4.9
Magnificent 7 31.3 14,527 23.9 5.0
公司 標普500指數權重(%) 市值(美元) 前置市盈率 研發費佔營業收入的比例(%)
蘋果 7.3 3,387 26.5 7.7美元
微軟 6.6 3,043 25.7 9.4
通過與技術領袖(包括NVIDIA)的合作,飛利浦繼續將AI迅速集成到其心血管超聲成像產品組合中,以幫助提高效率和生產力,並緩解員工短缺問題,同時爲越來越多的患者提供高質量的心臟病學護理。 5.7 2,649 24.1 13.2
亞馬遜 4.0 1,850 25.4 2.5
alphabet inc 3.9 1,808 16.6 2.0
Meta平台 2.4 1,118 19.2 5.5
特斯拉 1.4 672 55.4 4.9
科技七巨頭 31.3 14,527 23.9 5.0

In contrast, tech giants during the 2000s dot-com bubble were trading at much higher multiples. Cisco Systems, for example, had a forward P/E of 101.7, while Intel's was 42.1, significantly inflating their valuations relative to the broader market.

相比之下,在2000年代的互聯網泡沫時期,科技巨頭的市盈率要高得多。例如,思科系統的前瞻市盈率爲101.7,而英特爾的市盈率爲42.1,相對於整個市場大大膨脹了它們的估值。

Company S&P 500 Weight (%) Market Cap ($B) Forward P/E R&D (% of Revenue)
Microsoft 4.5 581 53.2 19.2
Cisco Systems 4.2 543 101.7 17.5
Intel 3.6 465 42.1 N/A
Oracle 1.9 245 84.6 N/A
IBM 1.7 218 23.5 28
Lucent Technologies 1.6 206 37.9 N/A
Nortel Networks 1.5 199 86.4 N/A
2000 Bubble Leaders 19.0 2,457 52.0 N/A
公司 標準普爾500指數權重(%) 市值(十億美元) 前置市盈率 研發費用(佔營業收入的比例)
微軟 4.5 581 53.2 19.2
思科系統 4.2 543 101.7 17.5
英特爾 3.6 465 $42.1萬 無數據
Oracle 1.9 245 84.6 無數據
這項協議是在日本新能源和工業技術開發組織(NEDO)下進行的「2納米一代半導體的Chiplet和Package Design和製造技術開發」項目框架內的國際合作的一部分,並建立在與IBM關於2納米節點技術的聯合開發已有協議的基礎上,IBM和Rapidus的工程師將在IBM的北美設施內進行半導體封裝的研發和製造,以供給高性能計算機系統使用。 1.7 218 23.5 28
Lucent Technologies 1.6 206 $37.9萬 無數據
北電網絡 1.5 199 86.4 無數據
2000泡沫領導者 19.0 2,457 52.0 無數據

Diversification: Key To Reduce Major Volatility Events

分散投資:降低主要波動事件的關鍵

The Goldman Sachs equity team is flagging the concentration risks that come with this tech dominance.

高盛股票團隊指出科技主導帶來的集中風險。

When a few stocks dominate market returns, the potential for "stock-specific mistakes" increases, exposing the broader market to severe corrections, Oppenheimer said. For instance, before the July market correction, the Magnificent Seven stocks were responsible for about 50% of the S&P 500's total returns for the year.

當少數股票主導市場回報時,"特定股票的錯誤" 的潛在可能性增加,使整個市場暴露於嚴重的調整中,奧本海默表示。例如,在七巨頭股票佔了標普500指數全年總回報的約50%之前,7月份市場調整前的情況。

"A market that becomes dominated by a few stocks becomes increasingly vulnerable to either disruption or anti-trust regulation," he said.

"市場變得由少數股票主導後,越來越容易遭受干擾或反壟斷法規的打擊," 他說。

A risk also exists that heightened competition and new entrants into the AI space could compress margins and slow growth for the market leaders.

還存在風險,即AI領域競爭加劇和新進入者可能壓縮市場領導者的利潤率並減緩增長。

Goldman Sachs recommends seeking opportunities beyond the tech behemoths, particularly in smaller tech companies and sectors tied to infrastructure spending, which may benefit from AI advancements.

高盛建議尋找超越技術巨頭的機會,特別是在較小的技術公司和與基礎設施支出相關的行業中,這些行業可能從人工智能的進展中受益。

The growth of infrastructure capex could boost old-economy industries that incorporate AI technologies into their operations, the firm said.

該公司表示,基礎設施資本支出的增長可能會推動將人工智能技術融入運營中的老牌經濟行業的發展。

  • S&P 500 Earnings Could Face Major Swings Under Harris Or Trump Tax Plans, Goldman Sachs Warns
  • 標準普爾500指數的盈利可能會在賀錦麗或特朗普的稅收計劃下面臨重大波動,高盛警告

Photo via Unsplash.

圖片來自Unsplash。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論