share_log

Athira Pharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ATHA) 81% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 38% as Well as Institutions

Athira Pharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ATHA) 81% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 38% as Well as Institutions

Athira Pharma,Inc.(NASDAQ:ATHA)上週虧損81%,個體投資者擁有38%的份額和機構都受到了波及。
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 23:29

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Athira Pharma indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • Athira Pharma股份的零售投資者相對較多,這表明他們在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權。
  • 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

If you want to know who really controls Athira Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:ATHA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道誰真正控制着Athira Pharma股份有限公司(納斯達克:ATHA),那麼您將不得不查看其股份登記冊的構成。我們可以看到零售投資者擁有該公司38%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將獲利最多(或者如果出現下滑,則損失最大)。

Following a 81% decrease in the stock price last week, retail investors suffered the most losses, but institutions who own 33% stock also took a hit.

上週股價下跌81%,零售投資者遭受了最大的損失,但持有33%股份的機構也受到了打擊。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Athira Pharma, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Athira Pharma的每種所有者,先從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:ATHA Ownership Breakdown September 5th 2024
納斯達克:ATHA所有權份額統計2024年9月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Athira Pharma?

機構持股結構對Athira Pharma有什麼影響?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Athira Pharma. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Athira Pharma's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所見,機構投資者在Athira Pharma擁有相當大的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,就有可能存在「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Athira Pharma的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事還有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGS:ATHA Earnings and Revenue Growth September 5th 2024
納斯達克GS:ATHA股票的收益和營業收入增長在2024年9月5日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 8.2% of Athira Pharma. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Perceptive Advisors LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. Baker Bros. Advisors LP is the second largest shareholder owning 8.2% of common stock, and Richard Kayne holds about 5.2% of the company stock.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金擁有Athira Pharma的8.2%。 這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能試圖影響管理層。 許多人希望在短期或中期內實現價值創造(以及更高的股價)。 Perceptive Advisors LLC目前是該公司最大的股東,持有14%的流通股。 Baker Bros. Advisors LP是第二大股東,持有8.2%的普通股,Richard Kayne持有公司股票的約5.2%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 13 have the combined ownership of 51% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更加深入的挖掘,我們發現前13名股東在該公司擁有51%的股權,這表明沒有單一股東對該公司有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Athira Pharma

Athira Pharma的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Athira Pharma, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$109m, and insiders have US$8.1m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到,athira股權投資公司的內部人員擁有股份。它的市值只有10900萬美元,內部人員名下的股份價值810萬美元。有些人可能會說,這顯示了股東和董事會之間的利益一致,儘管我們通常更願意看到更大的內部持股情況。但是值得檢查的是,這些內部人員是否一直在拋售股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆--包括散戶投資者--持有公司38%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然掌握話語權,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 14% stake in Athira Pharma. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

股權投資公司持有Athira Pharma 14% 的股份。這表明他們可能在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有些人可能喜歡這個,因爲股權投資有時是行動派,可以追責管理層。但有時候,股權投資會出售自己的股份,使公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Athira Pharma (3 are significant) that you should be aware of.

我發現看看哪些人擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經識別出了Athira Pharma的5個警示信號(其中有3個顯著),你應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論