share_log

Institutional Investors May Overlook Zions Bancorporation, National Association's (NASDAQ:ZION) Recent US$294m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

Institutional Investors May Overlook Zions Bancorporation, National Association's (NASDAQ:ZION) Recent US$294m Market Cap Drop as Long-term Gains Remain Positive

長期來看,機構投資者可能忽視了Zions Bancorporation, National Association (納斯達克:ZION) 最近2,9400萬美元市值下跌,但長期收益仍然是積極的。
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 20:08

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Zions Bancorporation National Association implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 15 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構在錫恩斯銀行全國協會的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價具有重要影響
  • 前15大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

Every investor in Zions Bancorporation, National Association (NASDAQ:ZION) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 79% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

納斯達克(納斯達克:錫恩)的每位投資者都應該了解最有影響力的股東團體。擁有該公司股份最多的團體,準確地說是大約79%的股份,是機構。換句話說,這個團體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$294m last week. However, the 41% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

上週,該公司的市值下跌了2.94億美元,機構投資者遭受了最高的損失。然而,41%的年回報率可能有助於緩解他們的總體損失。然而,他們應該注意未來可能進一步的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zions Bancorporation National Association.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大查看Zions Bancorporation National Association的不同所有權群體。

big
NasdaqGS:ZION Ownership Breakdown September 5th 2024
納斯達克GS:ZION 2024年9月5日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zions Bancorporation National Association?

機構投資者所有權告訴我們關於Zions Bancorporation National Association的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Zions Bancorporation National Association does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zions Bancorporation National Association's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Zions Bancorporation National Association確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有該公司的大部分股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界享有一定的信譽。然而,要謹慎依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在着他們參與了一個「擁擠的交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個方將可能競相快速拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以查看Zions Bancorporation National Association的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住故事總是更加複雜的。

big
NasdaqGS:ZION Earnings and Revenue Growth September 5th 2024
納斯達克GS:ZION盈利和營業收入增長2024年9月5日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zions Bancorporation National Association. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Harris Simmons is the owner of 1.1% of the company's shares.

投資者應該注意,實際上有超過一半的股份由機構持有,因此他們可以集體行使重大權力。我們注意到,對於Zions Bancorporation National Association,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約9.0%的流通股份,第三大股東持有4.2%的股份。此外,首席執行官Harris Simmons是公司股份的擁有者,持有1.1%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在公司中擁有50%的組合持股,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Zions Bancorporation National Association

Zions Bancorporation National Association的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Zions Bancorporation, National Association. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$148m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

股東可能會對蔡仁銀行國家協會擁有股份感興趣。這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的巨大利益是一件積極的事情。在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約14800萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會說,這表明了股東和董事會之間的利益一致。不過,值得檢查一下那些內部人員是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Zions Bancorporation National Association. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆通常是個體投資者,在蔡仁銀行國家協會持有19%的股份。雖然這個群體不能說了算,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生實質性影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Zions Bancorporation National Association better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Zions Bancorporation National Association .

始終值得考慮擁有一家公司股份的不同群體。但要更好地了解美國石安山大通銀行國民協會,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 爲此,您應該了解我們在美國石安山大通銀行國民協會發現的1個警告信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論