share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Standard BioTools Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LAB) Latest 9.2% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Standard BioTools Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LAB) Latest 9.2% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

機構投資者可能在標準生物科技公司(納斯達克:LAB)最新下跌9.2%進一步加劇了今年的損失後採取嚴厲措施
Simply Wall St ·  09/05 01:26

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Standard BioTools' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 機構持有的比例較高意味着Standard BioTools的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 共有4個投資者掌握51%的所有權。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

A look at the shareholders of Standard BioTools Inc. (NASDAQ:LAB) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

查看Standard BioTools Inc. (納斯達克股票代碼:LAB)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最有權勢。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有48%的股權。換句話說,這個集團在其對公司的投資中可能獲得最多(或損失最多)的收益。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 9.2% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 34% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Standard BioTools' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下跌了9.2%。這批投資者可能特別關注目前的虧損,這使得股東在過去一年已經損失了34%。機構或者"流動性提供者"掌控着大量資金,因此,這類投資者通常對股票價格的波動有很大的影響力。因此,如果標準生物工具公司的股票價格繼續走弱,機構投資者可能會覺得有必要拋售股票,這對個人投資者來說可能不是理想的。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Standard BioTools, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究標準生物工具公司的每一類股權所有者,首先從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:LAB Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
納斯達克全球選擇市場(NasdaqGS):LAb 股權分佈情況. 2024年9月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Standard BioTools?

機構投資者的持股情況向我們傳達了關於標準生物工具公司的什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Standard BioTools does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Standard BioTools' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,標準生物工具公司確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有該公司的大部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了該股票,並且他們看好它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在它們湧入的風險。當這樣一筆交易出現問題時,多個方面可能競相拋售股票。在一個沒有增長記錄的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到標準生物工具公司的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住故事並不僅限於此。

big
NasdaqGS:LAB Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
2024年9月4日納斯達克GS:LAb盈利和營業收入增長

It looks like hedge funds own 16% of Standard BioTools shares. That catches my attention because hedge funds sometimes try to influence management, or bring about changes that will create near term value for shareholders. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Casdin Capital, LLC with 19% of shares outstanding. Viking Global Investors LP is the second largest shareholder owning 16% of common stock, and Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited holds about 11% of the company stock.

看起來對Standard BioTools股票持有16%的對沖基金引起了我的注意,因爲對沖基金有時會試圖影響管理層,或者帶來能給股東帶來短期價值的變化。根據我們的數據,最大的股東是Casdin Capital, LLC,持有19%的流通股份。Viking Global Investors LP是第二大股東,持有16%的普通股,而Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited持有約11%的公司股票。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 51% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究還揭示了這樣一個事實:大約51%的公司由前4個股東控制,這表明這些所有者在業務上擁有重大影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Standard BioTools

Standard BioTools的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Standard BioTools Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$12m worth of the US$791m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

股東們可能會對得知Standard BioTools Inc.的內部人員持有股份感興趣。作爲個人,內部人員共同持有價值1200萬美元的該公司,總市值爲79100萬美元。這至少表明了一定程度的利益一致。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

總體來說,公衆股東,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能完全掌控公司,但肯定對公司經營產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 19% stake in Standard BioTools. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

股權投資公司持有Standard BioTools 19% 的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策方面發揮影響力。 一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵採取有助於市場認識公司價值的策略。另一方面,這些持有者可能會在將其上市後退出投資。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Standard BioTools better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Standard BioTools (2 are a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

值得考慮公司股東的不同群體。但要更好地了解Standard BioTools,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現Standard BioTools存在3個警告信號(其中有2個有點令人擔憂),您應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論