share_log

Is Graham Holdings (NYSE:GHC) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Graham Holdings (NYSE:GHC) Using Too Much Debt?

格雷厄姆控股(紐交所:GHC)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 21:06

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. We can see that Graham Holdings Company (NYSE:GHC) does use debt in its business. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過,'波動性與風險遠非同義詞。' 因此,當你考慮任何特定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。我們可以看到,格雷厄姆控股公司(紐交所:GHC)在業務中使用了債務。但股東們是否應該擔心它對債務的使用呢?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

一般來說,債務只有在公司無法輕鬆償還(無論是通過籌集資本還是憑藉自身現金流)時,才會成爲真正的問題。在最糟糕的情況下,如果公司無法償還其債權人的債務,則可能破產。雖然這不太常見,但我們經常看到受負債所困的公司因貸款人強制他們以不利的價格籌集資本而永久性稀釋股東權益。當然,有很多公司使用債務來資助發展,並沒有任何負面後果。在檢查債務水平時,我們首先要考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does Graham Holdings Carry?

格雷厄姆控股的債務有多少?

As you can see below, at the end of June 2024, Graham Holdings had US$1.01b of debt, up from US$710.8m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$962.8m, its net debt is less, at about US$48.9m.

正如你所見,在2024年6月底,格雷厄姆控股的債務爲10.1億美元,比一年前的7,108萬美元增加。點擊圖像了解更多細節。然而,由於公司擁有9,628萬美元的現金儲備,其淨債務較少,大約爲4,890萬美元。

big
NYSE:GHC Debt to Equity History September 4th 2024
紐交所:GHC債務與權益歷史,2024年9月4日

How Strong Is Graham Holdings' Balance Sheet?

Graham Holdings的資產負債表有多強?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Graham Holdings had liabilities of US$1.21b due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.88b falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$962.8m in cash and US$473.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$1.65b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Graham Holdings有US$1.21億的負債在一年內到期,US$1.88億的負債在此後到期。與此相抵,它有US$96.28萬的現金和US$47.3萬的應收賬款,這些都是在12個月內到期的。所以它的負債額比其現金和短期應收賬款總額多了US$1.65億。

While this might seem like a lot, it is not so bad since Graham Holdings has a market capitalization of US$3.50b, and so it could probably strengthen its balance sheet by raising capital if it needed to. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk. But either way, Graham Holdings has virtually no net debt, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load!

雖然這看起來似乎很多,但並不是很糟糕,因爲Graham Holdings的市值是US$3.5億,因此如果需要的話,可以通過融資來加強其資產負債表。但我們絕對希望密切關注其負債帶來的風險指標。但無論如何,Graham Holdings幾乎沒有淨負債,所以可以說它沒有很重的債務負擔!

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

我們使用兩個主要的比率來告訴我們相對於收益的債務水平。第一個是淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其利潤前利息和稅(EBIT)覆蓋其利息費用的次數(或其利息覆蓋率,簡稱)。因此,我們考慮與折舊和攤銷費用相關的盈利以及沒有相關費用的盈利相對於債務水平。

Graham Holdings has a very low debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.11 so it is strange to see weak interest coverage, with last year's EBIT being only 2.3 times the interest expense. So one way or the other, it's clear the debt levels are not trivial. Unfortunately, Graham Holdings's EBIT flopped 17% over the last four quarters. If that sort of decline is not arrested, then the managing its debt will be harder than selling broccoli flavoured ice-cream for a premium. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Graham Holdings can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Graham Holdings的淨債務與EBITDA比率非常低,爲0.11,所以奇怪的是利息覆蓋率較弱,去年的EBIT僅爲利息費用的2.3倍。因此不管哪種方式,都可以明顯看出負債水平不容忽視。不幸的是,過去四個季度Graham Holdings的EBIT下跌了17%。如果不阻止這種下降,管理其債務將比以溢價銷售西蘭花味冰淇淋更難。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定Graham Holdings能否不斷加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看這個顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Graham Holdings recorded free cash flow of 34% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,一個企業需要有自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤並不足以解決問題。因此,我們經常檢查有多少EBIt被轉化爲自由現金流。在最近的三年裏,格雷厄姆控股的自由現金流爲其EBIt的34%,這比我們預期的要弱。在償還債務方面,這並不樂觀。

Our View

我們的觀點

On the face of it, Graham Holdings's interest cover left us tentative about the stock, and its EBIT growth rate was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But on the bright side, its net debt to EBITDA is a good sign, and makes us more optimistic. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Graham Holdings stock a bit risky. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but we'd generally feel more comfortable with less leverage. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Graham Holdings (1 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

表面上,格雷厄姆控股的利息保障讓我們對股票持有觀望態度,而其EBIt的增長率也不比年度最忙的那家空餐廳更具吸引力。但好在其淨債務與EBITDA之比是一個好的跡象,讓我們更加樂觀。通過查看資產負債表並綜合考慮所有這些因素,我們確實認爲債務使得格雷厄姆控股的股票有一定的風險。這不一定是件壞事,但如果減少槓桿,我們通常會感覺更加舒適。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中最了解債務。但最終,每個公司都可能存在於資產負債表之外的風險。例如,我們發現了格雷厄姆控股的2個警示信號(1個不能忽視!),在投資此處之前,您應該了解這些。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論