share_log

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NASDAQ:NAMS) After 5.1% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

Painful Week for Private Equity Firms Invested in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NASDAQ:NAMS) After 5.1% Drop, Institutions Also Suffered Losses

股權投資公司在納斯達克上投資的NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.(納斯達克股票代碼:NAMS)遭遇5.1%的下跌,機構也遭受了損失。
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 21:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • NewAmsterdam Pharma's significant private equity firms ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 5 shareholders own 56% of the company
  • Insiders have bought recently
  • NewAmsterdam Pharma的股權投資機構持有大量股權,這意味着該機構的股東對公司的重要決策起着影響作用。
  • 前五大股東擁有公司的56%股份。
  • 內部人士最近購買了股票。

Every investor in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NASDAQ:NAMS) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is private equity firms. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每個投資NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V. (NASDAQ:NAMS)的投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。擁有公司最多的股份數量的群體,準確地說大約佔據了47%,就是股權投資機構。換句話說,該群體在他們對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最多)的利益。

While institutions who own 29% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$1.5b last week,private equity firms took the most losses.

上週市值下跌至15億美元后,持有29%股份的機構面臨壓力,私募股權公司蒙受了最大的損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about NewAmsterdam Pharma.

讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於NewAmsterdam Pharma的什麼情況。

big
NasdaqGM:NAMS Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
納斯達克GM:NAMS 2024年9月4日的股權拆分情況

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About NewAmsterdam Pharma?

機構持股告訴我們關於NewAmsterdam Pharma的什麼情況?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

NewAmsterdam Pharma already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see NewAmsterdam Pharma's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

NewAmsterdam Pharma已經有機構出現在股東名冊上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這意味着那些機構的分析師已經研究過這支股票,而且他們對它很看好。但與其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總會存在它們參與的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到NewAmsterdam Pharma的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更爲複雜。

big
NasdaqGM:NAMS Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
納斯達克GM:NAMS收益和營業收入增長2024年9月4日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 8.9% of NewAmsterdam Pharma. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Frazier Life Sciences Management, LP is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 12% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Michael Davidson directly holds 0.9% of the total shares outstanding.

我們的數據顯示,對沖基金持有NewAmsterdam Pharma 8.9%的股份。 這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能非常活躍和激進。 許多人尋找中期的催化劑,以推高股價。 Frazier Life Sciences Management,LP目前是最大的股東,持有14%的股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約13%和12%的股票。 另外,公司的CEO Michael Davidson直接持有總流通股的0.9%。

On looking further, we found that 56% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步調查發現,56%的股份由前5名股東持有。換句話說,這些股東在公司決策中有重要發言權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of NewAmsterdam Pharma

NewAmsterdam Pharma的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$18m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人士在NewAmsterdam Pharma Company N.V.擁有一些股份。內部人士持有價值1800萬美元的有意義的股份。大多數人會認爲這是一個真正的積極因素。大多數人會說,這表明股東和董事會利益的一致性。但是,值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否一直在拋售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over NewAmsterdam Pharma. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有11%的股權,一般公衆,主要是個人投資者,對NewAmsterdam Pharma有一定影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以左右政策決定向他們的有利,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 47%, private equity firms could influence the NewAmsterdam Pharma board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有47%的股份,可能會影響NewAmsterdam Pharma的董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權有時是激進派,能夠要求管理層負責任。但有時,私募股權會賣出股份,使公司上市。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand NewAmsterdam Pharma better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for NewAmsterdam Pharma you should be aware of.

值得考慮不同群體持有公司股票的情況,但要更好地了解NewAmsterdam Pharma,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。舉例來說:我們發現了NewAmsterdam Pharma的2個風險警示信號,您需要注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論