share_log

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, Ameren Corporation (NYSE:AEE) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 80% Ownership of the Shares, Ameren Corporation (NYSE:AEE) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有80%股權的Ameren Corporation(紐交所:AEE)受機構投資者嚴重主導
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 19:53

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Ameren implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 機構對阿曼瑞恩的大量持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響力
  • 一共有11個投資者擁有該公司50%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ameren Corporation (NYSE:AEE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 80% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解誰真正掌控着阿曼瑞恩公司(紐交所:AEE),了解企業的所有權結構至關重要。而持有最大比例的是機構,佔據了80%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該機構將獲得最大的利益(或者如果出現下跌則損失最多)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.

考慮到機構持有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者。因此,機構投資者投資公司的大量資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ameren, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討阿曼瑞恩的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NYSE:AEE Ownership Breakdown September 4th 2024
紐交所:AEE所有權拆分2024年9月4日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ameren?

機構所有權對阿曼瑞恩有何影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ameren. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ameren's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所見,機構投資者在阿曼瑞恩擁有大量持股。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好對依賴於機構投資者所謂的認可保持警惕。他們也有時會犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,存在它們參與的「過度交易」風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個交易方可能競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到阿曼瑞恩的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更多。

big
NYSE:AEE Earnings and Revenue Growth September 4th 2024
紐交所:AEE收入和營業收入增長2024年9月4日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Ameren. The company's largest shareholder is T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., with ownership of 14%. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 13% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 7.2% of the company stock.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,公司董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對阿曼瑞恩來說,基金並沒有實質性的投資。該公司最大的股東是t. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,持有14%的股權。第二大股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有公司普通股的13%,BlackRock, Inc.持有公司股份的約7.2%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記冊,我們發現其中 50% 的所有權受前11位股東控制,這意味着沒有單一股東掌握所有權益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Ameren

阿曼瑞恩的內部持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our information suggests that Ameren Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$92m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

根據我們的信息,阿曼瑞恩公司的內部人士持有的股份不到1%。由於它是一家大公司,我們只期望內部人士持有很少的股份。但值得注意的是,他們持有價值9200萬美元的股份。看到至少有一些內部股權是好事,但值得檢查這些內部人士是否一直在賣出股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

我覺得研究誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該意識到Lazard存在3個警告信號。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Ameren (1 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.

我發現了研究一家公司的實際股東是非常有趣的事情。但是爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經識別出了關於阿曼瑞恩的2個警告信號(其中1個不容忽視),你應該注意到。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論