share_log

Danaos (NYSE:DAC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Danaos (NYSE:DAC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

達那俄斯(紐交所:DAC)擁有一張相當健康的資產負債表
Simply Wall St ·  09/04 19:03

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Danaos Corporation (NYSE:DAC) does carry debt. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?

戴維·伊班說得很對:'波動性不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免資本的永久損失。' 因此,當您考慮任何給定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會拖垮一家公司。重要的是,達那俄斯公司(紐交所:DAC)確實存在債務。但這些債務是否會讓股東擔憂呢?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業成長的工具,但是如果一個企業無法償還其債權人的債務,則該企業存在於債權人的掌控之下。如果情況變得嚴重,債權人可以接管企業。雖然這種情況並不太常見,但我們經常見到負債累累的公司因爲債權人強迫他們以困境價格籌集資本而永久性地稀釋股東權益。話雖如此,最常見的情況是企業合理地管理其債務 - 並對其自身有利。考慮企業運用多少債務時,首先要做的是查看其現金和債務的總和。

How Much Debt Does Danaos Carry?

達那俄斯承擔了多少債務?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 Danaos had debt of US$569.7m, up from US$417.1m in one year. However, it also had US$471.7m in cash, and so its net debt is US$98.0m.

下圖顯示,2024年6月,達那俄斯的債務爲56970萬美元,比一年前的41710萬美元增加。然而,公司也持有47170萬美元的現金,因此淨債務爲9800萬美元。

big
NYSE:DAC Debt to Equity History September 4th 2024
紐約證券交易所:DAC債務與股權歷史,2024年9月4日

A Look At Danaos' Liabilities

了解達那俄斯的負債情況

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Danaos had liabilities of US$147.7m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$621.4m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$471.7m in cash and US$66.1m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$231.3m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

我們可以從最近的資產負債表中看到,達那俄斯有10.1477億美元的短期到期負債,超過1年到期的負債爲62.14億美元。與此相抵,它有4.717億美元的現金和6610萬美元的應收賬款,其中12個月內到期。所以它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合多了2.313億美元。

Since publicly traded Danaos shares are worth a total of US$1.59b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

由於達那俄斯的公開交易股份總值達到了15.9億美元,看起來不太可能這個負債水平會構成重大威脅。話雖如此,很明顯我們應繼續監視其資產負債表,以防負面變化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過將公司的淨債務與其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)相除,並計算其息稅前利潤(EBIT)如何覆蓋其利息費用(利息覆蓋率)來衡量公司的債務負擔相對於其盈利能力。因此,我們同時考慮債務的絕對數量以及所支付的利率。

Danaos's net debt is only 0.15 times its EBITDA. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 183 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. But the other side of the story is that Danaos saw its EBIT decline by 9.9% over the last year. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Danaos can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

達那俄斯的淨債務僅爲其息稅折舊及攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)的0.15倍。而其EBIT輕鬆覆蓋了利息支出,規模爲183倍。所以可以說,它受到的威脅並不比大象受到老鼠的威脅更大。但故事的另一面是,過去一年,達那俄斯的EBIT下降了9.9%。如果收益繼續以這個速度下降,公司可能會在管理其債務負擔方面遇到越來越大的困難。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,業務未來的盈利能力將決定達那俄斯是否能夠隨着時間加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想知道專業人士的想法,您可能會發現分析師盈利預測的免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the most recent three years, Danaos recorded free cash flow worth 53% of its EBIT, which is around normal, given free cash flow excludes interest and tax. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

但我們最終的考慮也很重要,因爲公司不能用紙面利潤償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,我們總是覈查多少EBIT轉化爲自由現金流。在最近的三年中,達那俄斯錄得的自由現金流價值相當於其EBIT的53%,這在正常範圍內,因爲自由現金流不包括利息和稅款。這筆冷硬現金意味着它可以在需要時減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Happily, Danaos's impressive interest cover implies it has the upper hand on its debt. But, on a more sombre note, we are a little concerned by its EBIT growth rate. All these things considered, it appears that Danaos can comfortably handle its current debt levels. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Danaos is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit unpleasant...

達那俄斯令人欣慰的利息保障意味着它在債務方面佔上風。但更令人擔憂的是它的稅息前利潤增長率。考慮到所有這些因素,似乎達那俄斯可以輕鬆應對其當前的債務水平。當然,雖然這種槓桿可以增強股本回報,但也帶來更多風險,所以值得密切關注。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表上了解債務情況最多。但最終,每家公司都可能存在資產負債表之外的風險。請注意,我們的投資分析顯示達那俄斯出現了2個警告信號,其中1個有點不太愉快...

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論