share_log

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get Ziff Davis (NASDAQ:ZD) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Three Years

Positive Earnings Growth Hasn't Been Enough to Get Ziff Davis (NASDAQ:ZD) Shareholders a Favorable Return Over the Last Three Years

正收益增長在過去三年內並不足以爲齊夫戴維斯(納斯達克:ZD)的股東帶來有利回報
Simply Wall St ·  09/03 18:27

Ziff Davis, Inc. (NASDAQ:ZD) shareholders should be happy to see the share price up 15% in the last month. Meanwhile over the last three years the stock has dropped hard. Regrettably, the share price slid 64% in that period. So it's good to see it climbing back up. The rise has some hopeful, but turnarounds are often precarious.

Ziff Davis, Inc. (納斯達克:ZD) 的股東應該對在過去一個月股價上漲15%感到滿意。然而,在過去三年中,股票下跌得很厲害。遺憾的是,股價在那個時期下滑了64%。所以很高興看到它正在回升。上漲有一些希望,但轉機往往是不穩定的。

The recent uptick of 3.8% could be a positive sign of things to come, so let's take a look at historical fundamentals.

最近3.8%的小幅上漲可能是好事的跡象,讓我們來看一下歷史基本面數據。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

禾倫·巴菲特在他的文章《格雷厄姆與多德維爾的超級投資者》中描述了股票價格並不總是合理地反映了一家企業的價值。考慮市場對一家公司的看法如何轉變的一種不完美但簡單的方法,是將每股收益(EPS)的變化與股價的動態進行比較。

Although the share price is down over three years, Ziff Davis actually managed to grow EPS by 85% per year in that time. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

儘管股價在三年內下跌,但在那段時間裏,Ziff Davis 的每股收益實際上增長了85%。鑑於股價的反應,人們可能會懷疑每股收益在該時期內對業務表現不是一個很好的指標(可能是由於一次性損失或收益所導致)。或者過去的增長預期可能不合理。

Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.

由於EPS的變化似乎與股價的變化不相關,因此值得查看其他指標。

Revenue is actually up 3.2% over the three years, so the share price drop doesn't seem to hinge on revenue, either. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Ziff Davis more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.

三年來,營業收入實際上增長了3.2%,所以股價下跌似乎並不依賴於營業收入。這個分析只是敷衍而已,但是仔細研究Ziff Davis可能是值得的,因爲有時候股票會不公平地下跌。這可能是一個機會。

You can see below how earnings and revenue have changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).

您可以看到以下收益和營收的變化情況(通過單擊圖像了解精確值)。

big
NasdaqGS:ZD Earnings and Revenue Growth September 3rd 2024
納斯達克: ZD收益和營業收入增長2024年9月3日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. So it makes a lot of sense to check out what analysts think Ziff Davis will earn in the future (free profit forecasts).

我們很高興地報告,CEO的報酬比大多數同樣資本化的公司的CEO的報酬要適度。關注CEO的薪酬總是值得的,但更重要的問題是公司是否會在未來幾年中增長收益。因此,檢查分析師對Ziff Davis未來收益的預測(免費利潤預測)非常有意義。

What About The Total Shareholder Return (TSR)?

那麼,股東總回報(TSR)呢?

Investors should note that there's a difference between Ziff Davis' total shareholder return (TSR) and its share price change, which we've covered above. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. Dividends have been really beneficial for Ziff Davis shareholders, and that cash payout explains why its total shareholder loss of 59%, over the last 3 years, isn't as bad as the share price return.

投資者應注意Ziff Davis的總股東回報率(TSR)與其股價變動之間存在差異,我們在上面已經介紹過。TSR是一個回報計算,考慮到現金股息的價值(假設任何收到的股息都重新投資了)以及任何折價的資本增資和分拆的計算價值。分紅對Ziff Davis股東非常有益,這筆現金支付解釋了爲什麼過去3年裏的總股東損失爲59%,並不像股價回報那樣糟糕。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

While the broader market gained around 25% in the last year, Ziff Davis shareholders lost 28%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Regrettably, last year's performance caps off a bad run, with the shareholders facing a total loss of 6% per year over five years. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Ziff Davis , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管整體市場在過去一年中上漲了約25%,Ziff Davis的股東們損失了28%。然而,請記住,即使是最好的股票有時也會在十二個月的時間裏表現不佳。遺憾的是,去年的表現標誌着一個糟糕的時間,股東們在過去五年中每年面臨6%的總損失。一般來說,長期股價疲軟可能是個壞兆頭,儘管逆勢投資者可能希望研究這支股票,期待逆轉。我發現長期關注股價作爲業務表現的一種代理很有趣。但要真正獲得深入的洞察,我們也需要考慮其他信息。例如,始終存在的投資風險陰影。我們已經發現了Ziff Davis的1個警示信號,理解它們應該成爲你投資過程的一部分。

We will like Ziff Davis better if we see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of undervalued stocks (mostly small caps) with considerable, recent, insider buying.

如果我們看到一些大額內部買單的話,我們會更喜歡Ziff Davis。在等待時,請查看這份免費的低估股票清單(主要是小市值股票),其中有相當多的最近內部買單記錄。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論