share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:CTBI) With 62% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:CTBI) With 62% Ownership

機構投資者在社區信託銀行(NASDAQ:CTBI)上擁有62%的股權
Simply Wall St ·  08/29 18:15

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Community Trust Bancorp implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在大衆信託合衆銀行的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有重大影響。
  • 前18大股東持有50%的股份。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

A look at the shareholders of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:CTBI) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 62% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

看一下大衆信託合衆銀行股份有限公司(NASDAQ:CTBI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最有實力。機構持有62%的股份,這是該公司的最大股本。換句話說,這個群體面臨的上升空間最大(或下跌風險)。

And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained US$51m in market cap last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 48% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週市值增長了5100萬美元,機構投資者的前景正在好轉。 股東的年回報率目前爲48%,上週的增長更是錦上添花。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Community Trust Bancorp.

在下面的圖表中,我們將重點關注Community Trust Bancorp的不同所有權人群。

1724926505773
NasdaqGS:CTBI Ownership Breakdown August 29th 2024
納斯達克:CTBI 2024年8月29日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Community Trust Bancorp?

機構持股情況能告訴我們關於Community Trust Bancorp的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Community Trust Bancorp does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Community Trust Bancorp's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Community Trust Bancorp確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這可能表明公司在投資社區有一定的可信度。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂確認持謹慎。他們也會有時候錯。如果多家機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面的Community Trust Bancorp收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

1724926508020
NasdaqGS:CTBI Earnings and Revenue Growth August 29th 2024
納斯達克GS:CTBI業績和營收增長2024年8月29日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Community Trust Bancorp. Our data shows that Community Trust and Investment Company is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.2% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

機構投資者擁有公司的50%以上股份,所以他們可能會對董事會的決策產生很大的影響力。我們注意到,對於大衆信託合衆銀行來說,對沖基金並沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,大衆信託投資公司是最大的股東,持有11%的流通股。作爲背景,第二大股東持有約8.2%的流通股,第三大股東持有6.5%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 18 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步的調查,我們發現前18名股東持有該公司50%的股份,這表明沒有任何單個股東控制着該公司。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

雖然研究一家公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以了解風向正在往哪裏吹。雖然有一些分析師對該股票進行了覆蓋,但隨着時間的推移,它可能仍然會變得更加知名。

Insider Ownership Of Community Trust Bancorp

大衆信託合衆銀行內部股權所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$895m, and insiders have US$38m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以報告,內部人員在大衆信託合衆銀行擁有股份。它的市值只有89500萬美元,內部人員以自己的名義持有3800萬美元的股份。看到內部人員有一些投資是好事,但值得注意的是,他們是否一直在買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆--包括散戶股東--擁有公司33%的股權,因此他們無法輕易被忽略。儘管這種所有權尺寸可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Community Trust Bancorp that you should be aware of.

我發現看看公司的股東究竟是誰非常有趣。但要真正獲取洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經發現了大衆信託合衆銀行的一個警示信號,你應該意識到。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論