share_log

Does Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does Plexus (NASDAQ:PLXS) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

普雷克薩斯(納斯達克:PLXS)有健康的資產負債表嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  08/29 03:51

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Plexus Corp. (NASDAQ:PLXS) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

大衛·伊本說得很好,'波動性並不是我們關心的風險。我們關心的是避免永久性的資本損失。'當我們考慮一家公司有多大風險時,我們總是喜歡看它的債務使用情況,因爲債務過載可能導致滅亡。我們注意到Plexus Corp.(納斯達克股票代碼:PLXS)確實在其資產負債表上有債務。但真正的問題是這些債務是否讓公司變得有風險。

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

當企業無法通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行債務義務時,債務和其他負債會變得有風險。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法定義務,股東可能一無所有。然而,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,一家公司必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東權益,僅僅爲了控制債務。然而,通過代替股份稀釋,債務對於需要資金以高回報率投資增長的企業來說,可以是一個非常好的工具。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用情況時,我們首先看現金和債務的總體情況。

How Much Debt Does Plexus Carry?

Plexus承載多少債務?

As you can see below, Plexus had US$303.8m of debt at June 2024, down from US$447.5m a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$269.9m in cash leading to net debt of about US$33.9m.

正如下圖所示,Plexus在2024年6月的債務爲303.8百萬美元,較去年同期的447.5百萬美元下降。相反,它有269.9百萬美元的現金,從而導致淨債務約爲33.9百萬美元。

1724874710750
NasdaqGS:PLXS Debt to Equity History August 28th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:PLXS股權負債歷史記錄2024年8月28日

A Look At Plexus' Liabilities

普雷克薩斯的負債情況一覽

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that Plexus had liabilities of US$1.72b due within 12 months and liabilities of US$179.8m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$269.9m as well as receivables valued at US$759.8m due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$874.9m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

從最新的資產負債表數據來看,我們可以看到普雷克薩斯有17.2億美元的短期債務,在12個月內到期;而超過該期限的負債有17,980萬美元。抵消這些債務的是2,6990萬美元現金,以及在12個月內到期的75,980萬美元應收賬款。所以,普雷克薩斯的負債總額比現金和近期應收賬款合計多出87,490萬美元。

Plexus has a market capitalization of US$3.46b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. However, it is still worthwhile taking a close look at its ability to pay off debt. Carrying virtually no net debt, Plexus has a very light debt load indeed.

普雷克薩斯的市值爲3.46億美元,如果有需要,它很可能籌集資金來改善資產負債表。然而,我們仍然有必要仔細研究它償還債務的能力。普雷克薩斯幾乎沒有淨債務,債務負擔非常輕。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

While Plexus's low debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.13 suggests only modest use of debt, the fact that EBIT only covered the interest expense by 6.7 times last year does give us pause. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. On the other hand, Plexus's EBIT dived 18%, over the last year. If that rate of decline in earnings continues, the company could find itself in a tight spot. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Plexus's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

儘管普雷克薩斯的債務/EBITDA比率爲0.13,只表明了對債務的適度使用,但去年EBIT與利息支出的比率僅爲6.7倍,這確實令我們擔憂。但利息支付肯定足夠讓我們思考其債務的支付能力。另一方面,普雷克薩斯的EBIT在過去一年下降了18%。如果收益下降速度繼續下去,公司可能會陷入困境。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但與任何東西相比,未來的盈利將決定普雷克薩斯保持健康資產負債表的能力。所以,如果您關注未來,可以查看這個免費的報告,顯示分析師的盈利預測。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, Plexus reported free cash flow worth 12% of its EBIT, which is really quite low. For us, cash conversion that low sparks a little paranoia about is ability to extinguish debt.

但我們最後需要考慮的也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤支付債務,它需要實際現金。因此,我們必須明確看看EBIT是否帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去的三年中,普雷克薩斯報告的自由現金流只相當於EBIT的12%,這實際上非常低。對我們來說,這種低的現金轉化率會引發對其償還債務能力的一些擔憂。

Our View

我們的觀點

Plexus's EBIT growth rate and conversion of EBIT to free cash flow definitely weigh on it, in our esteem. But the good news is it seems to be able handle its debt, based on its EBITDA, with ease. When we consider all the factors discussed, it seems to us that Plexus is taking some risks with its use of debt. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Plexus you should know about.

普雷克薩斯的EBIT增長率和EBIT轉化爲自由現金流肯定對其產生了重大影響,我們認爲。但好消息是,根據其EBITDA,它似乎能夠輕鬆應對其債務。當我們綜合考慮所有討論的因素時,我們認爲普雷克薩斯在債務使用方面存在一些風險。雖然債務可以提高回報,但我們認爲公司目前的槓桿已經足夠。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時應重點關注的區域。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中-遠非如此。這些風險很難發現。每個公司都有這些風險,而我們已經發現了1個普雷克薩斯的警示信號,您應該了解。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論