share_log

The Past Three Years for Pinterest (NYSE:PINS) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

The Past Three Years for Pinterest (NYSE:PINS) Investors Has Not Been Profitable

過去三年對pinterest(紐交所:PINS)投資者來說並不盈利
Simply Wall St ·  08/28 21:07

For many investors, the main point of stock picking is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But the risk of stock picking is that you will likely buy under-performing companies. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term Pinterest, Inc. (NYSE:PINS) shareholders, since the share price is down 43% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 18%. Shareholders have had an even rougher run lately, with the share price down 25% in the last 90 days.

對許多投資者來說,股票挑選的主要目的是要比整體市場獲得更高的回報。但股票挑選的風險在於你可能會買入表現不佳的公司。不幸的是,這對於長揸紐約證券交易所:PINS的Pinterest股東來說就是這種情況,因爲股價在過去三年下跌了43%,遠遠低於大約18%的市場回報。股東們最近的情況甚至更加艱難,股價在最近90天下跌了25%。

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

鑑於此,值得看看該公司的基本面是否一直是長期業績的驅動因素,或者是否存在一些不一致之處。

There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One imperfect but simple way to consider how the market perception of a company has shifted is to compare the change in the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price movement.

不可否認的是,市場有時是高效的,但價格並不總是反映潛在的商業表現。一個不完美但簡單的方法來考慮公司市場感知如何改變是比較每股收益(EPS)變化和股價變動。

Pinterest became profitable within the last five years. We would usually expect to see the share price rise as a result. So it's worth looking at other metrics to try to understand the share price move.

在過去五年內,pinterest已經實現盈利。我們通常會期望看到股價的上漲。因此值得關注其他指標來嘗試理解股價的波動。

Revenue is actually up 11% over the three years, so the share price drop doesn't seem to hinge on revenue, either. This analysis is just perfunctory, but it might be worth researching Pinterest more closely, as sometimes stocks fall unfairly. This could present an opportunity.

營業收入實際上在過去三年裏增長了11%,因此股價下跌似乎並不依賴於營收。這份分析只是敷衍了事,但值得更仔細地研究pinterest,因爲有時股票的下跌是不公平的。這可能會帶來機會。

The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail).

下圖顯示了收益和營收隨時間變化的情況(如果你點擊圖像,可以看到更多細節):

1724850457851
NYSE:PINS Earnings and Revenue Growth August 28th 2024
紐交所:PINS的盈利和營業收入增長2024年8月28日

It's probably worth noting that the CEO is paid less than the median at similar sized companies. It's always worth keeping an eye on CEO pay, but a more important question is whether the company will grow earnings throughout the years. So we recommend checking out this free report showing consensus forecasts

值得注意的是,CEO的薪水低於規模相似公司的中位數。關注CEO的薪酬總是值得的,但更重要的問題是公司是否會在多年內增長收益。因此,我們建議查看這份顯示共識預測的免費報告。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

Pinterest shareholders are up 15% for the year. But that was short of the market average. On the bright side, that's still a gain, and it is certainly better than the yearly loss of about 1.3% endured over half a decade. It could well be that the business is stabilizing. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Pinterest you should be aware of.

Pinterest的股東今年漲幅爲15%。但這低於市場平均水平。好的一面是,這仍然是一種收益,並且絕對優於過去半個世紀遭受的每年1.3%的虧損。很可能業務正在穩定。雖然考慮市場條件對股價的不同影響是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。舉個例子:我們注意到Pinterest有2個警示信號,您應該注意。

For those who like to find winning investments this free list of undervalued companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket.

對於那些喜歡尋找獲勝投資的人來說,最近有內部購買的低估公司免費列表可能是一個很好的選擇。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論