share_log

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 83% Ownership of the Shares, MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

擁有83%股份的msa safety incorporated(紐交所: MSA)受機構所有者嚴重主導
Simply Wall St ·  08/24 00:39

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies MSA Safety's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 9 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 董事會持有的股份較高意味着MSA Safety的股價對其交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 總共有9個投資者持有該公司50%的股權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls MSA Safety Incorporated (NYSE:MSA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制着MSA Safety Incorporated (紐交所: MSA),那麼你需要看看它的股東註冊的構成。我們可以看到機構在公司中佔有很大的份額,擁有83%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該機構群體將獲益最多(或者在經濟下行時損失最大)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因爲機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往帶有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者來說。因此,機構投資在一家公司中的大量資金通常被視爲一個積極因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of MSA Safety.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了MSA Safety的不同所有權群體。

1724431148982
NYSE:MSA Ownership Breakdown August 23rd 2024
紐交所:MSA所有權分佈2024年8月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About MSA Safety?

機構所有權告訴我們關於MSA Safety的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in MSA Safety. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of MSA Safety, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所見,機構投資者在MSA Safety中擁有相當大的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這支股票,而且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能犯錯。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時嘗試賣出股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得檢查一下MSA Safety過去的收益軌跡(如下)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

1724431150543
NYSE:MSA Earnings and Revenue Growth August 23rd 2024
紐交所:MSA安全的收入和營業收入在2024年8月23日實現了增長。

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in MSA Safety. Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.7% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 8.2% of the company stock.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可以共同對董事會決策產生強大的影響力。 對於MSA Safety而言,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。 目前持有最多股份的是ABP養老基金,佔已發行股份的12%。 第二大股東是Vanguard集團,持有9.7%的普通股,而BlackRock公司持有該公司約8.2%的股份。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前9大股東持有超過股份註冊的一半,還有一些小股東平衡大股東的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of MSA Safety

MSA Safety的內部所有權情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in MSA Safety Incorporated. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$376m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說,MSA Safety Incorporated的內部人員確實持有股份。 這是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些可能有意義的結盟通常是積極的。 在這種情況下,他們擁有價值約3.76億美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。 如果您想探討內部人員的結盟問題,可以 點擊這裏 查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 12% stake in MSA Safety. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,在MSA Safety持有12%的股份。 儘管這種所有權相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東的觀點不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand MSA Safety better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for MSA Safety that you should be aware of.

始終值得考慮在公司中擁有股份的不同群體。但爲了更好地了解MSA Safety,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了MSA Safety的2個警示信號,你應該注意。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論