share_log

Does Ball (NYSE:BALL) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Does Ball (NYSE:BALL) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?

Ball(紐交所:BALL)的資產負債表健康嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  08/21 20:55

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Ball Corporation (NYSE:BALL) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

有人認爲,作爲投資者,最好的風險考量方式是波動性,而不是債務,但禾倫·巴菲特曾經說過"波動性遠非風險的代名詞"。因此,看來聰明的資金知道,債務(通常涉及破產)是評估公司風險性時非常重要的因素。我們注意到,Ball Corporation(紐交所:BALL)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但真正的問題是,這筆債務是否使公司承擔了風險。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務在企業順利償還時可以成爲有益的資金讓其發展,然而如果企業無力償還,依靠新的資本和自由現金流來償還。如果情況真的非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制企業。儘管這種情況不是很常見,我們通常看到負債企業永久性地稀釋股東的股權,因爲貸款人迫使它們以低於正常價格的價格發行股票。當然,債務的好處是它通常代表着廉價的資本,尤其是當這些資本可以替代不利及投資回報率高的公司進行注資時。我們在考慮公司的債務使用時會首先考慮現金和債務。

What Is Ball's Net Debt?

Ball的淨債務是多少?

As you can see below, Ball had US$5.79b of debt at June 2024, down from US$9.74b a year prior. On the flip side, it has US$1.36b in cash leading to net debt of about US$4.43b.

正如您在下面所看到的,截至2024年6月,Ball的債務爲57.9億美元,比前一年的97.4億美元有所減少。另一方面,公司有13.6億美元的現金,淨債務約爲44.3億美元。

1724244951994
NYSE:BALL Debt to Equity History August 21st 2024
紐交所:BALL的股債比歷史數據(2024年8月21日)

How Strong Is Ball's Balance Sheet?

貝爾公司的資產負債表有多強?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Ball had liabilities of US$4.89b due within a year, and liabilities of US$7.09b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$1.36b as well as receivables valued at US$2.71b due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$7.91b more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,貝爾公司的短期負債爲48.9億美元,長期負債爲70.9億美元。與此同時,該公司擁有13.6億美元的現金和27.1億美元的應收款項,這些款項將在12個月內到期。因此,貝爾公司的負債總額比其現金和短期應收款項的總和多了79.1億美元。

Ball has a very large market capitalization of US$19.3b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

貝爾公司的市值非常大,達到了193億美元,所以如果需要的話,它很有可能籌集資金改善資產負債表。但我們肯定要密切注意負債是否帶來了太高的風險。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。

Ball's net debt is sitting at a very reasonable 2.1 times its EBITDA, while its EBIT covered its interest expense just 3.9 times last year. While that doesn't worry us too much, it does suggest the interest payments are somewhat of a burden. We note that Ball grew its EBIT by 23% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Ball can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

貝爾公司的淨債務與其EBITDA的比率非常合理,爲2.1倍,而其EBIt去年僅覆蓋了3.9倍的利息支出。雖然這並不讓我們太擔心,但它確實暗示着利息支付有一定的負擔。我們注意到,貝爾公司過去一年其EBIt增長了23%,這應該使其更容易償還債務。毫無疑問,資產負債表最能反映出債務的情況,但最終業務的未來盈利能力將決定貝爾公司能否持續強化其資產負債表。因此,如果您想知道專業人士的想法,您可能會發現關於分析師盈利預測的這份免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. During the last three years, Ball burned a lot of cash. While investors are no doubt expecting a reversal of that situation in due course, it clearly does mean its use of debt is more risky.

最後,雖然稅務部門可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受真金白銀的現金。所以我們始終檢查貝爾公司的EBIt有多少能轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,貝爾公司燒掉了大量的現金。雖然投資者無疑期望這種情況能逆轉,但這明顯意味着其債務使用更加風險。

Our View

我們的觀點

Ball's struggle to convert EBIT to free cash flow had us second guessing its balance sheet strength, but the other data-points we considered were relatively redeeming. In particular, its EBIT growth rate was re-invigorating. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Ball's debt poses some risks to the business. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Ball (2 are a bit unpleasant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

Ball在將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流方面的困難讓我們開始對其資產負債表的實力產生疑慮,但我們考慮的其他數據點相對較好。特別是,它的EBIT增長率令人振奮。綜合考慮上述因素,我們認爲Ball的債務對業務造成了一些風險。雖然這筆債務可以提高回報,但我們認爲公司目前的槓桿足夠。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中獲取了關於債務的大部分信息。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表之內,遠非如此。例如,我們發現了Ball存在3個警示信號(其中有2個有點不愉快!)在投資之前,您應該了解這些信息。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,專注於沒有淨債務的公司往往更好。您可以訪問我們的特別列表,其中包括所有表現出盈利增長軌跡的公司。這是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論