With 83% Institutional Ownership, CSW Industrials, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSWI) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
With 83% Institutional Ownership, CSW Industrials, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSWI) Is a Favorite Amongst the Big Guns
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies CSW Industrials' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構持有股份的比例顯著較高,這意味着CSW Industrials的股價會對他們的交易產生敏感影響。
- 共有11位投資者擁有該公司的大部分股份,共佔所有股權的52%。
- 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。
A look at the shareholders of CSW Industrials, Inc. (NASDAQ:CSWI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 83% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
觀察CSW Industrials, Inc.(納斯達克: CSWI)的股東,我們可以了解哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到,機構擁有該公司83%的股份。換句話說,該群體將從其投資入公司中獲得最大利益(或承受最大損失)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of CSW Industrials.
在下圖中,我們將關注CSW Industrials的不同所有權群體.
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About CSW Industrials?
機構持倉告訴我們關於CSW Industrials的什麼信息?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。
We can see that CSW Industrials does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see CSW Industrials' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到CSW Industrials確實有機構投資者;並且他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這表明公司在投資社區中擁有一定的信譽度。但是,最好要警惕依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一種股票時,總是存在着他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個交易方可能會競相快速賣出股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到CSW Industrials的歷史收益和營業收入情況,但請牢記,故事總是更加複雜。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. CSW Industrials is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.8% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.2% and 7.0% of the stock.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半以上的發行股份,該董事會可能會注意他們的偏好。CSW Industrials並不是由對沖基金擁有。我們的數據顯示,The Vanguard Group,股份有限公司是最大的股東,持有7.8%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有大約7.2%和7.0%的股份。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到11個頭寸最大的股東控制着52%的所有權,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有的權益超過了多數權益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。
Insider Ownership Of CSW Industrials
CSW Industrials董事長擁有的股份
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
We can see that insiders own shares in CSW Industrials, Inc.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around US$66m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們可以看到CSW Industrials, Inc.的內部人員持有股份。這是一個相當大的公司,所以看到一些可能具有意義的一致性是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有約6600萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲這顯示了股東和董事會之間的一致性。但是,還是值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在賣出股份。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
總體來說,公衆股東,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能完全掌控公司,但肯定對公司經營產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。