share_log

With 70% Ownership of the Shares, Hawkins, Inc. (NASDAQ:HWKN) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

With 70% Ownership of the Shares, Hawkins, Inc. (NASDAQ:HWKN) Is Heavily Dominated by Institutional Owners

霍金斯公司(納斯達克股票代碼:HWKN)擁有70%的股份,嚴重受到機構股東的控制。
Simply Wall St ·  08/13 21:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Hawkins' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 15 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 機構持股比例較高表明霍金斯材料的股價受機構交易行爲影響較大。
  • 共有15名投資者擁有該公司的多數股份,擁有50%的所有權。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Hawkins, Inc. (NASDAQ:HWKN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 70% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

想要了解霍金斯材料(納斯達克代碼:HWKN)真正的控制者是誰,理解其所有權結構是很重要的。機構持有公司的最大股份爲70%。換句話說,該機構面對了最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

由於機構擁有巨額資金,他們的市場舉動往往受到零售或個人投資者的嚴密審查。因此,機構在公司中的大量投資通常被認爲是一個積極的特徵。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hawkins, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地了解霍金斯的每一位所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:HWKN Ownership Breakdown August 13th 2024
納斯達克GS: HWKN 2024年8月13日的所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hawkins?

機構持有情況對霍金斯有何影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Hawkins does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Hawkins, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到霍金斯確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大部分股份。這表明公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。然而,不要過度依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯誤。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時嘗試拋售某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,值得注意的是查看霍金斯過去的盈利軌跡(如下圖)。當然,還要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGS:HWKN Earnings and Revenue Growth August 13th 2024
納斯達克: HWKN收入和盈利增長2024年8月13日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hawkins is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 15% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.3% of common stock, and Hawkins Inc., ESOP holds about 4.8% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Patrick Hawkins, the CEO has 1.6% of the shares allocated to their name.

由於機構投資者持有的公司已經超過了發行的股份一半,所以公司董事會可能會關注他們的偏好。霍金斯不歸避套戥基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們發現最大的股東是黑石集團(BlackRock, Inc.),持有公司流通股份的15%。第二大股東是Vanguard Group, Inc.,持有7.3%的普通股,而霍金斯材料公司員工持股計劃公司(ESOP)持有大約4.8%的公司股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官帕特里克·霍金斯(Patrick Hawkins)名下分配的股份佔公司股份的1.6%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過更深入的挖掘,我們發現前15名股東在公司中擁有50%的組合持股,這表明沒有單一的股東對公司擁有重大控制權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of Hawkins

霍金斯的內部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Hawkins, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$96m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

股東可能會很高興地了解到內部人員都持有霍金斯材料公司的股份。內部人士持有價值9600萬美元的可觀股權,大多數人都會認爲這是一項真正的利好。看到內部人員進行這種投資是好事。您可以點擊此處查看近期內部人員是否一直在進行購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 22% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公衆——包括零售投資者——持有該公司22%的股份,因此不容易被忽視。雖然持有量相當可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論