share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CTKB) Recent 15% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Cytek Biosciences, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CTKB) Recent 15% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

隨着Cytek Biosciences,Inc.(納斯達克:CTKB)近15%的下跌增加了一年的損失,機構投資者可能會採取戲劇性的行動。
Simply Wall St ·  08/09 20:23

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Cytek Biosciences implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 7 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構對賽泰克生物的大量持股意味着它們對該公司的股價有很大的影響力。
  • 前7大股東擁有公司50%的股份
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:CTKB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 51% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

要了解Cytek Biosciences, Inc. (納斯達克:CTKB)真正的控制者是誰,了解企業的所有權結構非常重要。 持有該公司股份數量最多的集團,確切地說是約51%的機構。 換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 15% last week. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 40% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Cytek Biosciences, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

上週該公司股價下跌15%,機構投資者蒙受了最高損失。對於這群投資者來說,最近的虧損(加上股東的一年虧損40%)可能不盡如人意。機構或「提供流動性的人」掌握大量資金,因此這些投資者通常對股價波動有很大的影響力。因此,如果頹勢繼續,機構可能面臨出售賽泰克生物的壓力,這可能會對個體投資者產生負面影響。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cytek Biosciences.

讓我們更仔細地查看不同類型的股東對賽泰克生物有何啓示。

big
NasdaqGS:CTKB Ownership Breakdown August 9th 2024
納斯達克GS:CTKb所有權結構2024年8月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cytek Biosciences?

機構所有權對Cytek Biosciences有何影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Cytek Biosciences does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cytek Biosciences' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到賽泰克生物確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的相當大部分股票。這可能表示公司在投資社區中有一定的信譽度,但最好不要過於依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證,他們也會犯錯誤。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總會存在他們參與的「擁擠交易」的風險,當這種交易出現問題時,多個交易方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到賽泰克生物的歷史收益和營收數據,但請記住,故事還有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGS:CTKB Earnings and Revenue Growth August 9th 2024
納斯達克GS:CTKb收入和營收增長2024年8月9日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cytek Biosciences. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Brown Capital Management, LLC and The Vanguard Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.2%. Additionally, the company's CEO Wenbin Jiang directly holds 4.1% of the total shares outstanding.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重要的權力。我們注意到,對於賽泰克生物,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資意義。我們的數據顯示,管理資產大約13%的黑石集團是最大的股東。第二和第三大股東是布朗資本管理有限公司和先鋒集團股份有限公司,在公司的總股份中,其持股同樣佔了9.2%。此外,公司的首席執行官姜文斌直接持有總流通股份的4.1%。

We also observed that the top 7 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我們還觀察到,前7名股東擁有超過一半的股份登記冊,還有一些小股東來平衡較大股東的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Cytek Biosciences

Cytek Biosciences的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in Cytek Biosciences, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$59m worth of stock in the US$669m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到賽泰克生物的內部人員擁有股份。內部人員以自己的名字擁有美國6690萬美元公司的5900萬美元股票。看到內部人員投資一些資金是好事,但值得一提的是,最好確認這些內部人員是否一直在購買股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 30% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有該公司的30%股權,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能必然控制該公司,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生實際影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 10%, private equity firms could influence the Cytek Biosciences board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私人股權公司持有10%的股份,可以影響賽泰克生物的董事會。有時我們看到私募股權公司長期堅持,但總的來說,他們的投資週期較短,而且--顧名思義--不會在公開市場上投資。過一段時間後,他們可能會決定出售並將資本重新投向其他領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cytek Biosciences better, we need to consider many other factors.

了解持股群體是很有價值的,但要更好地了解賽泰克生物,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論