Investors Three-year Losses Continue as Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) Dips a Further 9.5% This Week, Earnings Continue to Decline
Investors Three-year Losses Continue as Omega Flex (NASDAQ:OFLX) Dips a Further 9.5% This Week, Earnings Continue to Decline
If you are building a properly diversified stock portfolio, the chances are some of your picks will perform badly. Long term Omega Flex, Inc. (NASDAQ:OFLX) shareholders know that all too well, since the share price is down considerably over three years. Regrettably, they have had to cope with a 69% drop in the share price over that period. And more recent buyers are having a tough time too, with a drop of 46% in the last year. Furthermore, it's down 28% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders. This could be related to the recent financial results - you can catch up on the most recent data by reading our company report.
如果您正在構建一個適當分散的股票組合,那麼您的一些選擇可能會表現不佳。 長揸Omega Flex,Inc.(納斯達克:OFLX)的股東深受其困擾,因爲股價在三年多的時間裏大幅下跌,遺憾的是,股價在這段時間內下跌了69%。 並且最近的買家也正在經歷困難時期,去年下跌了46%。 另外,它在大約一個季度內下跌了28%。這對股東來說並不好玩。這可能與最近的財務結果有關-可以通過閱讀我們的公司報告了解最新的數據。
After losing 9.5% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.
這周失去了9.5%之後,值得調查公司的基本面,看看我們可以從過去的表現中推斷出什麼。
To quote Buffett, 'Ships will sail around the world but the Flat Earth Society will flourish. There will continue to be wide discrepancies between price and value in the marketplace...' One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.
引用巴菲特的話說,“船隻會在世界各地航行,但是持平地球學會會蓬勃發展。在市場上,價格和價值之間將繼續存在巨大的差距……”評估公司周圍情緒變化的一種有缺陷但合理的方法是將每股收益(EPS)與股價進行比較。
Omega Flex saw its EPS decline at a compound rate of 7.8% per year, over the last three years. The share price decline of 32% is actually steeper than the EPS slippage. So it's likely that the EPS decline has disappointed the market, leaving investors hesitant to buy.
在過去三年中,Omega Flex的每股收益以年複合率下降了7.8%。股價下跌32%,實際上比每股收益下降得更多。因此,EPS的下降可能已經令市場感到失望,使投資者猶豫不決。
You can see below how EPS has changed over time (discover the exact values by clicking on the image).
下面可以看到每股收益隨時間的變化情況(通過點擊圖像來查看確切數值)。
We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. Dive deeper into the earnings by checking this interactive graph of Omega Flex's earnings, revenue and cash flow.
我們很高興地報告,首席執行官的報酬比同等資本化公司的大多數首席執行官要適度。 但是,雖然檢查首席執行官的報酬總是值得的,但真正重要的問題是公司能否在未來增長收益。通過查看Omega Flex的收益、營業收入和現金流的交互式圖表來深入挖掘收益。
A Different Perspective
不同的觀點
Investors in Omega Flex had a tough year, with a total loss of 45% (including dividends), against a market gain of about 18%. However, keep in mind that even the best stocks will sometimes underperform the market over a twelve month period. Unfortunately, last year's performance may indicate unresolved challenges, given that it was worse than the annualised loss of 6% over the last half decade. Generally speaking long term share price weakness can be a bad sign, though contrarian investors might want to research the stock in hope of a turnaround. Before deciding if you like the current share price, check how Omega Flex scores on these 3 valuation metrics.
Omega Flex的投資者度過了艱難的一年,總損失達45%(包括股息),而市場則獲得了約18%的增長。 但是,請記住,即使最好的股票有時也會在十二個月的時間內表現不佳。不幸的是,去年的表現可能表明存在未解決的挑戰,因爲它比過去五年半的年化虧損6%還要糟糕。一般來說,長期的股價走軟可能是一個壞跡象,但反對者投資者可能希望研究股票以期實現翻盤。在決定是否喜歡當前股價之前,請檢查Omega Flex在這三個估值指標上的得分。
But note: Omega Flex may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).
但是請注意:Omega Flex可能不是最好的股票購買選項。因此,請查看此過去收益增長(以及進一步增長預測)的有趣公司的免費列表。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。