share_log

ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO) CEO Meisong Lai's Holdings Dropped 6.6% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO) CEO Meisong Lai's Holdings Dropped 6.6% in Value as a Result of the Recent Pullback

中通快遞(開曼)股份有限公司(紐交所:ZTO)CEO賴梅松的持股價值因最近回落而下降了6.6%。
Simply Wall St ·  07/30 18:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in ZTO Express (Cayman)'s growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 4 shareholders
  • Institutions own 37% of ZTO Express (Cayman)
  • 從持有一定數量的股權來看,內部人員似乎對中通快遞(開曼)有着濃厚的興趣。
  • 前四大股東持有公司50%的股份。
  • 據我們了解,機構擁有中通快遞(開曼)37%的股權。

If you want to know who really controls ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 40% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想了解究竟是誰掌控了中通快遞(開曼)股份,您需要看看其股份登記冊的構成。具體而言,個人內部人員擁有公司最多的股份,佔據了40%的股權。也就是說,如果股票上漲了,他們將獲得最大的益處(或者如果股票走低了,則將失去最多的股權)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 6.6%.

最近一週,該股票下跌了6.6%,內部人遭受了最大損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ZTO Express (Cayman).

讓我們近距離看看不同類型的股東對中通快遞(開曼)的意義。

big
NYSE:ZTO Ownership Breakdown July 30th 2024
2024年7月30日,紐交所中通快遞(開曼)股權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZTO Express (Cayman)?

機構持股對中通快遞(開曼)意味着什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

ZTO Express (Cayman) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ZTO Express (Cayman), (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

中通快遞(開曼)的股份登記冊已經有機構的身影。事實上,他們持有公司相當大的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區有着一定的信譽。然而,我們最好對依賴機構投資者的所謂鑑證持有一定的警惕性。因爲他們也會做出錯誤的判斷。如果兩個大型機構投資者嘗試同時賣出一隻股票,股價下跌是很常見的。所以最好檢查一下中通快遞(開曼)的過去收益軌跡(如下圖)。當然,也要考慮其他因素。

big
NYSE:ZTO Earnings and Revenue Growth July 30th 2024
2024年7月30日,紐交所中通快遞(開曼)盈利和營業收入增長情況

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ZTO Express (Cayman). Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Meisong Lai with 26% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 8.1% of the stock.

我們注意到,對於中通快遞(開曼),對沖基金沒有重大的投資。我們的數據顯示,最大股東是董事長賴梅松,持有公司26%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有的股票約佔股票總數的8.4%和8.1%。

Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.

我們的研究也揭示了一個事實,即四大股東大約控制着公司的50%的股份,這表明這些所有者在業務中具有重要的影響力。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

雖然研究一個公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師預期增長也是有意義的,因爲很多分析師都有關注這些股票,因此可以很容易地了解預期增長。

Insider Ownership Of ZTO Express (Cayman)

中通快遞(開曼)的內部人員持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.. Insiders own US$6.1b worth of shares in the US$15b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人員持有中通快遞(開曼)公司相當大比例的股份,高達61億美元。這是相當有意義的。大多數人都會很高興看到公司的董事會與他們一起投資。您可能想要查看此免費圖表,以查看內部人員的最新交易情況。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

總體來說,公衆股東,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司15%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能完全掌控公司,但肯定對公司經營產生真正的影響。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

Public companies currently own 8.4% of ZTO Express (Cayman) stock. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

公共公司目前擁有中通快遞(開曼)股票8.4%的持股。這可能是一種戰略利益,這兩家公司可能有相關的業務利益。可能是他們進行了分拆。這個持股可能值得進一步深入調查。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - ZTO Express (Cayman) has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

雖然考慮到所有擁有公司的各個群體都是有意義的,但更重要的因素還有其他因素。例如風險 - 中通快遞(開曼)有一個警告信號,我們認爲你應該意識到這一點。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您希望了解分析師在未來增長方面的預測,請務必不要錯過這份免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論