share_log

Is WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Using Too Much Debt?

Is WD-40 (NASDAQ:WDFC) Using Too Much Debt?

wd-40 (納斯達克:WDFC) 是否使用了太多債務?
Simply Wall St ·  07/26 19:18

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that WD-40 Company (NASDAQ:WDFC) does use debt in its business. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

霍華德·馬克斯說得好,不應該擔心股價波動,“我擔心的是永久性損失的可能性……我認識的每位實際投資者都會這樣擔心。” 當我們考慮一家公司有多冒險時,我們總是喜歡查看其使用的債務,因爲債務負擔過重可能導致破產。 我們看到WD-40公司(納斯達克:WDFC)確實在業務中使用債務。 但真正的問題是這些債務是否使公司冒險。

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但如果企業無法償還債權人,則該企業存在於債權人的憐憫之下。如果情況變得非常糟糕,債權人可以控制該企業。然而,一種更常見(但仍然很痛苦的)情況是,它必須以低價格籌集新的股權資本,從而永久稀釋股東權益。話雖如此,最常見的情況是,公司合理地管理其債務,並使其對自身有利。考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要做的是查看其現金和債務總額。

How Much Debt Does WD-40 Carry?

WD-40負債有多重?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that WD-40 had debt of US$107.8m at the end of May 2024, a reduction from US$136.1m over a year. However, it also had US$45.3m in cash, and so its net debt is US$62.5m.

下面的圖像顯示,在2024年5月底,WD-40的負債爲1.078億美元,較去年減少了13.61億美元。 不過,它也有4,530萬美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲6,250萬美元。

big
NasdaqGS:WDFC Debt to Equity History July 26th 2024
NasdaqGS:WDFC股本負債歷史記錄2024年7月26日

How Strong Is WD-40's Balance Sheet?

WD-40資產負債表強度如何?

Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that WD-40 had liabilities of US$105.2m due within 12 months and liabilities of US$116.1m due beyond that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$45.3m as well as receivables valued at US$116.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$59.6m.

通過放大最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到WD-40因拖欠金結算和賬款所需的負債達1.052億美元,超過12個月未到期的負債爲1.161億美元。 抵消這些義務,它有4,530萬美元的現金以及價值1.164億美元的應收賬款需在12個月內到期。 所以其負債高出其現金和(短期)應收賬款的額度爲5,960萬美元。

Having regard to WD-40's size, it seems that its liquid assets are well balanced with its total liabilities. So it's very unlikely that the US$3.44b company is short on cash, but still worth keeping an eye on the balance sheet.

考慮到WD-40公司的規模,它的流動資產與總負債的平衡非常良好。 因此,這家344億美元的公司很不可能缺乏現金,但仍需關注資產負債表的情況。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。

WD-40 has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.60. And its EBIT covers its interest expense a whopping 22.0 times over. So we're pretty relaxed about its super-conservative use of debt. Also good is that WD-40 grew its EBIT at 11% over the last year, further increasing its ability to manage debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if WD-40 can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

WD-40公司的淨債務與EBITDA比率僅爲0.60,其EBIt覆蓋其利息費用達到22.0倍。 因此,我們對其極爲保守的使用債務感到放心。 另外,WD-40公司在過去一年中將其EBIt增長了11%,這進一步增加了其管理債務的能力。 毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中了解債務的大部分信息。 但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定WD-40公司是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。 因此,如果您想了解專業人士的想法,您可能會發現這份分析師利潤預測免費報告很有趣。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, WD-40 produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 63% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

但我們最後的考慮也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙上的利潤來支付債務; 它需要硬通貨。 因此,我們顯然需要關注EBIt是否導致相應的自由現金流。 在過去的三年中,WD-40的自由現金流穩定,相當於其EBIt的63%,正如我們所期望的一樣。 這些自由現金流使公司有能力在適當時期償付債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

The good news is that WD-40's demonstrated ability to cover its interest expense with its EBIT delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And the good news does not stop there, as its net debt to EBITDA also supports that impression! Looking at the bigger picture, we think WD-40's use of debt seems quite reasonable and we're not concerned about it. While debt does bring risk, when used wisely it can also bring a higher return on equity. Over time, share prices tend to follow earnings per share, so if you're interested in WD-40, you may well want to click here to check an interactive graph of its earnings per share history.

好消息是,WD-40公司證明了覆蓋利息費用的EBIt令我們像毛絨狗一樣歡喜。 好消息並沒有止於此,因爲其淨債務與EBITDA也支持這種印象! 從更大的角度來看,我們認爲WD-40公司的債務使用似乎相當合理,我們對此並不擔心。 雖然債務確實帶來風險,但如果明智地使用,它也可能帶來更高的資本回報率。 隨着時間的推移,股價往往會跟隨每股收益,因此如果您對WD-40感興趣,您可能希望單擊此處以查看其每股收益歷史記錄的交互式圖表。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有這些工作之後,更感興趣於擁有堅實資產負債表的快速發展公司,請立即查看我們的淨現金成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論