Institutional Investors of Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 4.7% Drop
Institutional Investors of Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS) Must Be Disappointed After Last Week's 4.7% Drop
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Worthington Steel's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 3 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構持有大量的Worthington Steel股份,這意味着其股價對機構的交易行爲很敏感。
- 前 3 名股東擁有公司的 50%。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls Worthington Steel, Inc. (NYSE:WS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着Worthington Steel, Inc. (紐交所:WS),那麼你需要看看其股份註冊成分。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有54%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 4.7%.
上週,機構遭受了最大的損失,因爲股票下跌了4.7%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Worthington Steel.
在下面的圖表中,我們將放大 Worthington Steel 的不同股權組。
![big](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240725/0-69aeabf0a0b695b2e9656723fe724d0a-0-85bba19ab91be37e303d04ced9806a83.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Worthington Steel?
機構持有情況告訴我們 Worthington Steel 的什麼信息?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Worthington Steel does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Worthington Steel's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,Worthington Steel 確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究了股票並且他們喜歡它。但就像其他人一樣,他們可能是錯誤的。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。 因此,值得看看 Worthington Steel 下面的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
![big](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240725/0-69aeabf0a0b695b2e9656723fe724d0a-1-43dca71b6a01ba3933ed618c14cde469.png/big)
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Worthington Steel is not owned by hedge funds. John McConnell is currently the company's largest shareholder with 29% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 10% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Geoffrey Gilmore is the owner of 0.6% of the company's shares.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有超過一半的公司股份,所以他們可以集體行使重要的權力。Worthington Steel沒有被對沖基金所擁有。約翰·麥康奈爾(John McConnell)目前是該公司最大的股東,持有29%的流通股。爲了提供上下文,第二大股東持有約11%的流通股,第三大股東持有約10%的所有權。此外,CEO Geoffrey Gilmore擁有公司0.6%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
上海阿拉丁生物化學技術股份有限公司的內部人員擁有重要比例,內部人員在這家總價值27億人民幣的公司中持有12億人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以單擊此處查看他們是否進行了買賣。
Insider Ownership Of Worthington Steel
Worthington Steel 的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Worthington Steel, Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$570m stake in this US$1.8b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人士保持了 Worthington Steel, Inc. 的顯著持股。看到內部人士在這個價值18億美元的公司中持有着有意義的5700萬美元的股份,這是非常有趣的。大多數人會說,特別是在這樣一個規模的公司中,這顯示了與股東的良好對齊。您可以在這裏查看這些內幕人是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Worthington Steel. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
通常是個人投資者的一般公衆持有Worthington Steel的15%的股份。 股權的規模雖然相當大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司的政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Worthington Steel that you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有公司的不同組群是值得的,但存在着更爲重要的其他因素。例如,我們已經識別出 Worthington Steel 的 2 個警示信號,你需要注意一下。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。