Ferrari N.V. (NYSE:RACE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 34% of the Company
Ferrari N.V. (NYSE:RACE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 34% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ferrari's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 12 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- 11% of Ferrari is held by insiders
- 機構股東持有股份較高意味着法拉利的股票價格對他們的交易行爲很敏感。
- 共有12名投資者擁有公司的大部分股權,擁有50%的所有權。
- 法拉利有11%的內部持股。
If you want to know who really controls Ferrari N.V. (NYSE:RACE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 34% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果您想了解誰真正控制着法拉利N.V.(紐交所:RACE),那麼您需要查看其股權登記冊的構成。機構擁有公司的最多股份,佔34%。也就是說,該機構在其投資中獲得最大利潤(或損失最多)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.
由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Ferrari, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究法拉利的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
![big](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240723/0-dd5030ec7cff872212181b4bb9d42c32-0-37dcaa8c385e65e40e7879339ae7d600.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ferrari?
機構股權告訴我們法拉利的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that Ferrari does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Ferrari, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看出,法拉利確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司的大部分股票。這可以表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,過度依賴機構投資者的所謂驗證是值得警惕的。他們有時也會犯錯。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,最好檢查法拉利的過去收益軌跡(下面)。當然,也要記住考慮其他因素。
![big](https://newsfile.futunn.com/public/NN-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240723/0-dd5030ec7cff872212181b4bb9d42c32-1-9077e6017661da804ef509526772b487.png/big)
Ferrari is not owned by hedge funds. Giovanni Agnelli B.V. is currently the largest shareholder, with 25% of shares outstanding. Piero Ferrari is the second largest shareholder owning 11% of common stock, and Baillie Gifford & Co. holds about 3.4% of the company stock.
法拉利不是由對沖基金擁有。吉奧瓦尼·阿涅利b.V.目前是最大的股東,持有公司流通股的25%。皮耶羅·法拉利是第二大股東,擁有普通股的11%,Baillie Gifford & Co.持有約3.4%的公司股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我們對所有權的深入研究表明,前12名股東合計擁有50%的持股,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Ferrari
法拉利的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Ferrari N.V.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$7.9b stake in this US$75b business. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來內部人員擁有法拉利N.V.的相當大比例。看到內部人員在這家750億美元企業中持有意義重大的79億美元的股份非常有趣。大多數人會認爲這顯示了控股股東的良好管理,尤其是在這種規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看內部人員是否一直在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
儘管考慮不同擁有公司的團體是值得的,但有些因素更爲重要。例如,我們已經爲中國醫藥系統控股公司確定了2個警示信號,您應該注意到這些信號。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 25%, of the Ferrari stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看起來私人公司擁有法拉利股票的25%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份而非個人容量來對公共公司投資有利。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是一個進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ferrari better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮到一個公司的股權歸屬情況始終是值得思考的。但要更好地了解法拉利,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。