share_log

Insiders Continue to Buy HBT Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:HBT) and Now Own 60% Shares

Insiders Continue to Buy HBT Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:HBT) and Now Own 60% Shares

內部人士繼續買入HBt金融公司股票(納斯達克:HBT),現在擁有60%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  07/23 20:17

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over HBT Financial implies vested interests in company growth
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Fred Drake with a 55% stake
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • HBt Financial有着顯著的內部控制,意味着對業務增長有着既得利益。
  • 該公司最大的股東是Fred Drake,持有55%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of HBT Financial, Inc. (NASDAQ:HBT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 60% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

爲了了解HBt Financial(NASDAQ:HBT)真正的掌控者是誰,了解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。 個人內部人擁有公司的最大股份,佔股60%。 換句話說,該組面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

Insiders who purchased recently should be particularly happy after the stock gained 7.4% in the past week.

最近購買的內部人員應該特別高興,因爲該股在過去一週上漲了7.4%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of HBT Financial, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討HBt Financial的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:HBT Ownership Breakdown July 23rd 2024
納斯達克:HBt所有權分佈2024年7月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HBT Financial?

機構對HBt Financial的所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

HBT Financial already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of HBT Financial, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

HBt Financial的股份登記冊上已經有了機構。 實際上,他們擁有公司的相當大的股份。 這表明具有專業投資者的可信度。 但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。 如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出股票,看到大幅下跌的股價是很常見的。 因此,值得檢查HBt Financial的過去收益軌跡(下面)。 當然,也要記住還有其他要考慮的因素。

big
NasdaqGS:HBT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 23rd 2024
納斯達克:HBt收益和營業收入增長2024年7月23日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in HBT Financial. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Fred Drake (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 55% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.7% and 3.1% of the stock. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Roger Baker is also a Member of the Board of Directors, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders.

對於HBt Financial而言,對沖基金沒有太多股份。 從我們的數據中可以推斷,最大的股東是Fred Drake(也擔任高級主管的職務),持有55%的已發行股份。當內部人員擁有公司的大量股份時,這通常被認爲是一個好的信號,在這種情況下,我們很高興看到公司內部人員扮演關鍵股東的角色。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約5.7%和3.1%的股票。有趣的是,第三大股東Roger Baker也是董事會成員,這再次表明公司高級股東內部擁有強大的所有權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管有道理去研究一家公司的機構所有權數據,但了解分析師的觀點也很有道理,以便知道市場的風向。由於相當多的分析師涵蓋了該股票,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of HBT Financial

HBt Financial內部人員擁有超過一半的股份。 這使他們有效地控制了公司。 這意味着他們擁有價值43700萬美元的股份,而公司總市值爲72800萬美元。 這相當有意義。很高興看到這種投資水平。您可以在這裏查看內部人員最近是否有購買。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of HBT Financial, Inc.. This gives them effective control of the company. That means they own US$437m worth of shares in the US$728m company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有HBt Financial的16%股份。 儘管這個群體不能單獨決定,但它肯定可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 16% stake in HBT Financial. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

我對公司的實際所有者有興趣。 但是,要真正獲得見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。 例如,投資風險的永遠存在的幽靈。 我們已經在HBt Financial中確定了2個警告信號(至少有1個有點令人擔憂),了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with HBT Financial (at least 1 which is a bit concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我發現查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。 但是,要真正獲得見解,我們需要考慮其他信息。 例如,投資風險的永遠存在的幽靈。 我們已經在HBt Financial中確定了2個警告信號(至少有1個有點令人擔憂),了解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論