share_log

Immunome, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IMNM) Institutional Investors Lost 6.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Immunome, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:IMNM) Institutional Investors Lost 6.0% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains

Immunome公司(納斯達克:IMNM)的機構投資者上週虧損了6.0%,但從長期來看受益。
Simply Wall St ·  07/22 19:00

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Immunome implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 11 shareholders
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 機構在Immunome擁有大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價有重大影響。
  • 排名前11的股東持有該業務的52%。
  • 內部人員最近一直在買入。

If you want to know who really controls Immunome, Inc. (NASDAQ:IMNM), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正掌控Immunome,Inc.的控股人(NASDAQ:IMNM),那麼你必須看它的股東註冊表。我們可以看到機構佔有該公司的絕大部分股份,擁有52%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者出現下行),該集團將獲得最大的利益。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 6.0% in value last week. However, the 83% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

沒有股東希望自己的投資虧損,特別是機構投資者上週看到其持股市值下跌6.0%。但是,83%的一年回報率可能有助於緩解他們的整體損失。但他們應該謹防未來進一步的虧損。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Immunome.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東對Immunome能告訴我們什麼。

big
NasdaqCM:IMNM Ownership Breakdown July 22nd 2024
NasdaqCM:IMNm所有權分析2024年7月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Immunome?

機構所有權告訴我們有關Immunome什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Immunome. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Immunome's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Immunome中擁有相當一部分股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者帶來的所謂認可。他們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面的Immunome收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

big
NasdaqCM:IMNM Earnings and Revenue Growth July 22nd 2024
NasdaqCM:IMNm收入和收入增長2024年7月22日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. It would appear that 15% of Immunome shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Redmile Group, LLC, with ownership of 8.2%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.6% and 6.5% of the stock. In addition, we found that Clay Siegall, the CEO has 0.7% of the shares allocated to their name.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司的一半以上,因此可以集體行使重大權力。看起來,15%的Immunome股票由對沖基金控制。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。許多投資者希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(和更高的股價)。公司最大的股東是Redmile Group,LLC,持有8.2%的所有權。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有大約7.6%和6.5%的股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Clay Siegall擁有0.7%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 52% of the ownership is controlled by the top 11 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到11個頭寸最大的股東控制着52%的所有權,這意味着沒有單個股東擁有的權益超過了多數權益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Immunome

Immunome的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Immunome, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$35m worth of the US$798m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以報告說內部人員擁有Immunome,Inc.的股票。作爲個人,內部人員集體擁有價值3500萬美元的公司79800萬美元。這至少表明了一些一致性。你可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人員是否一直在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 19% stake in Immunome. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Immunome的19%的股份。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但它肯定對公司的經營產生了實質性的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 9.5%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的9.5%。私人公司可能是相關方。有時候內部人員通過持有私人公司的股份,而不是以個人的身份,表現出他們對一家公衆公司的興趣。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但這值得注意作爲進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Immunome (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同集團很值得,但更重要的是其他因素。例如,不斷存在的投資風險威脅。我們已經確定Immunome存在兩個警告信號(至少有一個是重要的),了解它們應該成爲你的投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論