share_log

Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Arcosa (NYSE:ACA) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

arcosa(紐交所:ACA)似乎相當明智地使用債務。
Simply Wall St ·  07/20 21:41

The external fund manager backed by Berkshire Hathaway's Charlie Munger, Li Lu, makes no bones about it when he says 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Arcosa, Inc. (NYSE:ACA) does carry debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

巴菲特的合夥人Charlie Munger支持的外部基金經理Li Lu曾明確表示,“最大的投資風險不在於價格波動,而在於您是否會遭受永久性資本損失。”因此,當您考慮一隻股票的風險時,需要考慮其債務,因爲過多的債務可以致使一家公司沉沒。不過,Arcosa, Inc. (NYSE:ACA)確實有債務。但股東們是否應該擔心其使用債務呢?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來了什麼風險?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

當企業無法通過自由現金流或以有吸引力的價格籌集資本來輕鬆地滿足債務義務時,債務和其他負債對企業變得有風險。在最壞的情況下,一家公司無法償還債權人的債務將會破產。但更頻繁(但仍然代價高昂)的情況是,一家公司必須以非常低的價格發行股票,以永久性地稀釋股東,以彌補其資產負債表的不足。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是在資本性企業中。考慮企業使用多少債務時,首先要做的是將其現金和債務合併在一起看。

How Much Debt Does Arcosa Carry?

Arcosa承載了多少債務?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at March 2024 Arcosa had debt of US$595.8m, up from US$531.8m in one year. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$176.5m, its net debt is less, at about US$419.3m.

下面的圖片(可單擊以獲取更詳細信息)顯示,截至2024年3月,Arcosa的債務爲5,958萬美元,高於一年前的5,318萬美元。但由於其擁有1,765萬美元的現金儲備,因此其淨債務爲約41,930萬美元。

big
NYSE:ACA Debt to Equity History July 20th 2024
NYSE:ACA Debt to Equity History July 20th 2024

How Healthy Is Arcosa's Balance Sheet?

Arcosa的資產負債表狀況如何?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Arcosa had liabilities of US$434.9m due within a year, and liabilities of US$859.4m falling due after that. Offsetting this, it had US$176.5m in cash and US$366.2m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities total US$751.6m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,Arcosa短期負債爲4,349萬美元,超過1年內到期的負債爲8,594萬美元。與此同時,該公司擁有1,765萬美元的現金和3,662萬美元的應收賬款,在12個月內到期。因此,其負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合多751.6萬美元。

Given Arcosa has a market capitalization of US$4.32b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

考慮到Arcosa的市值爲4.32億美元,很難相信這些負債會造成太大的威脅。但是我們認爲股東們應該繼續監控公司的資產負債表。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了比較一個公司的債務與其收益的關係,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益和利息前的收益(其利息覆蓋率)。因此,我們考慮了債務的絕對數量以及支付的利率。

Arcosa has net debt of just 1.2 times EBITDA, indicating that it is certainly not a reckless borrower. And it boasts interest cover of 7.4 times, which is more than adequate. And we also note warmly that Arcosa grew its EBIT by 11% last year, making its debt load easier to handle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Arcosa's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Arcosa的淨債務爲1.2倍的EBITDA,表明它絕不是不負責任的借款人。它的利息覆蓋倍數高達7.4倍,足以應對。我們也熱切地注意到,Arcosa去年的EBIT增長了11%,這使得其債務負擔更容易處理。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯然的起點。但是,更重要的是未來的收益將決定Arcosa維持健康的資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您關注未來,可以查看此免費報告,其中顯示了分析師的盈利預測。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Arcosa recorded free cash flow of 48% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.

但是我們的最後一個考慮也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙上盈利來支付債務;它需要冷硬的現金。因此,我們始終會檢查EBIT中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。從最近三年的數據來看,Arcosa的自由現金流僅爲其EBIT的48%,這比我們預期的要弱。這種疲弱的現金轉化率使得處理負債變得更加困難。

Our View

我們的觀點

On this analysis, Arcosa's net debt to EBITDA was a real positive, just like an unsolicited gift of cupcakes from a work colleague. And its EBIT growth rate should also leave shareholders feeling frolicsome. All these things considered, it appears that Arcosa can comfortably handle its current debt levels. Of course, while this leverage can enhance returns on equity, it does bring more risk, so it's worth keeping an eye on this one. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For example - Arcosa has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

在此分析中,Arcosa的淨債務與EBITDA的比例是一項真正的優勢,就像同事送來的杯子蛋糕一樣。其EBIT增長率也應讓股東們感到欣喜。考慮到這些因素,Arcosa似乎可以輕鬆處理其當前的債務水平。當然,雖然這種槓桿可以增強股本回報,但它也帶來了更多風險,因此值得關注。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是關注的重點。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表之外的風險。例如-Arcosa存在2個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論