share_log

Digimarc Corporation's (NASDAQ:DMRC) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 9.8% Over Last Week

Digimarc Corporation's (NASDAQ:DMRC) High Institutional Ownership Speaks for Itself as Stock Continues to Impress, up 9.8% Over Last Week

數字標識公司(納斯達克股票代碼:DMRC)的高機構持股比例證明了其自身價值,股票上週漲幅爲9.8%。
Simply Wall St ·  03:30

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Digimarc's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 5 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 由於機構擁有Digimarc股份的很大比例,因此機構的交易決策可能會對Digimarc的股價產生影響。
  • 前五大股東持有該公司52%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

Every investor in Digimarc Corporation (NASDAQ:DMRC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 43% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每個Digimarc Corporation (NASDAQ:DMRC)的投資者都應該知道最具有影響力的股東群體。機構擁有該公司的最大股份,佔比43%。這意味着該群體在股價上漲時將獲得最大收益(或在股價下跌時將損失最多)。

Last week's 9.8% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. One-year return to shareholders is currently 12% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.

上週的9.8%漲幅意味着即使公司表現出強勁的長期趨勢,機構投資者仍處於積極端。股東目前的一年回報率爲12%,而上週的漲幅則是錦上添花。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Digimarc, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入挖掘Digimarc的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:DMRC Ownership Breakdown July 18th 2024
納斯達克:DMRC所有權分析報告2024年7月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Digimarc?

機構所有權告訴我們有關Digimarc的什麼信息?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Digimarc already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Digimarc's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Digimarc已經有機構在持有其股票。實際上,它們在該公司擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界擁有一定的信譽度。然而,最好還是謹慎地考慮依賴機構投資者所謂的證明。它們有時也會出錯。當多個機構持有股票時,總是存在着他們參與的市場風險。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Digimarc的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,這只是故事的一部分。

big
NasdaqGS:DMRC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 18th 2024
納斯達克:DMRC營收和收入增長分析報告2024年7月18日

It looks like hedge funds own 14% of Digimarc shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. With a 18% stake, CEO Riley McCormack is the largest shareholder. With 14% and 10% of the shares outstanding respectively, Altai Capital Management, L.P. and Vincent Smith are the second and third largest shareholders.

看起來對沖基金擁有Digimarc股票的14%。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(和更高的股價)。 CEO Riley McCormack擁有18%的股份,是最大的股東。Altai Capital Management,L.P.和Vincent Smith分別持有股份的14%和10%。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以達到同樣的效果。雖然該公司有一些分析師關注,但它可能沒有得到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在未來得到更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Digimarc

Digimarc內部股權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Digimarc Corporation. Insiders have a US$223m stake in this US$734m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據表明內部股東擁有Digimarc Corporation的一個相當比例的股份。內部股東在這家價值7,3400萬美元的公司中持有2,2300萬美元的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有很多股份。您可以點擊此處查看他們是否一直在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有公司的13%股權,因此不能被輕易忽略。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們有利時推動政策決策,但他們仍可以共同影響公司的政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Digimarc has 3 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我認爲查看一個公司的所有者真正擁有公司很有趣。但是,爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。例如風險——Digimarc有3個警戒信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論