share_log

Institutional Investors in Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA) See US$89m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA) See US$89m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

儘管機構投資者看到Liquidia Corporation (納斯達克股票代碼:LQDA)的市值上週下降了8900萬美元,但他們從長期的獲益中受益。開多
Simply Wall St ·  07/19 01:03

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Liquidia implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 7 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • 11% of Liquidia is held by insiders
  • 機構持有大量Liquidia股份表明他們對公司股價具有重大影響力。
  • 前7名股東擁有公司的54%。
  • Liquidia的11%由內部人士持有。

If you want to know who really controls Liquidia Corporation (NASDAQ:LQDA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 42% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想了解誰真正控制Liquidia Corporation(納斯達克:LQDA),那麼你需要查看公司股權登記簿的構成。機構持有42%的股份,是公司最大的股東。這意味着如果股票上漲(或遇到低迷行情),該機構群體將獲得最大收益(或者遭受最大損失)。

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 9.3% in value last week. However, the 43% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧錢,尤其是機構投資者,上週他們看到自己的持股價值下降了9.3%。然而,43%的一年回報可能有助於緩解他們的總體損失。我們假設,他們將密切關注未來的弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Liquidia, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Liquidia每種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqCM:LQDA Ownership Breakdown July 18th 2024
納斯達克創業板:LQDA所有權分佈2024年7月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Liquidia?

機構持有權對Liquidia有什麼影響?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

Liquidia already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Liquidia, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

Liquidia的股權登記簿已經有機構持有。確實,他們在公司裏擁有可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者間對公司的信譽性有所認可。但不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲有時機構也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股價大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,有必要檢查Liquidia的過去收益軌跡(如下圖所示)。當然,也要考慮其他因素。

big
NasdaqCM:LQDA Earnings and Revenue Growth July 18th 2024
納斯達克創業板:LQDA利潤和營業收入增長情況2024年7月18日

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 15% of Liquidia. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that Caligan Partners, LP is the largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Legend Aggregator Advisors, LLC and Patient Square Capital, LP, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 9.4%. Furthermore, CEO Roger Jeffs is the owner of 2.6% of the company's shares.

我們的數據顯示,對於Liquidia,對沖基金擁有15%的所有權。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金可能非常活躍和行動派。許多人尋找中期的催化劑,以推高股價。我們的數據顯示,Caligan Partners,LP是最大的股東,持有15%的流通股。第二和第三大股東是Legend Aggregator Advisors,LLC和Patient Square Capital,LP,他們的股份相等,各自持有9.4%的股份。此外,首席執行官Roger Jeffs擁有公司2.6%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 7 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

經過進一步檢查,我們發現該公司超過一半的股權由前7大股東持有,這意味着較小股東的利益在一定程度上可以平衡較大股東的利益。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Liquidia

Liquidia的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Liquidia Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$980m, and insiders have US$110m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Liquidia Corporation的大量股權。其市值僅爲9800萬美元,而內部人士自己持有價值1,100萬美元的股份。這可能表明公司的創始人仍擁有很多股份。點擊此處查看他們是否有買賣行爲。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Liquidia. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

個人投資者(大多數是散戶)持有Liquidia 13%的股權,對Liquidia具有某種影響力。雖然擁有此類股份很重要,但如果決策與其他大型股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司策略。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 9.4%, private equity firms could influence the Liquidia board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

持有9.4%股份的私募股權公司可能會對Liquidia的董事會產生影響。有些人可能喜歡這一點,因爲私募股權公司有時會是激進派,會追責管理層。但有時,私募股權公司正在賣出,並上市公司。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 9.4%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司9.4%的股份。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究一下誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方可能通過單獨的私人公司擁有公共公司的股份利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Liquidia .

我非常感興趣看看誰真正擁有公司。但爲了獲得真正的洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該知道我們在Liquidia上發現的1個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論