share_log

FuboTV Inc. (NYSE:FUBO) Surges 15%; Retail Investors Who Own 56% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

FuboTV Inc. (NYSE:FUBO) Surges 15%; Retail Investors Who Own 56% Shares Profited Along With Institutions

FuboTV Inc.(紐交所:FUBO)股價上漲15%; 擁有56%股份的散戶投資者與機構同樣受益。
Simply Wall St ·  07/17 20:39

Key Insights

主要見解

  • fuboTV's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 36% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
  • 41% of fuboTV is held by Institutions
  • fuboTV的大量零售投資者持股表明關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 前25名股東持有36%的業務。
  • 機構持有fuboTV的41%。

Every investor in fuboTV Inc. (NYSE:FUBO) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 56% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

fuboTV Inc. (NYSE:FUBO)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。最大的股東群體是持有56%股權的零售投資者。換句話說,該群體從他們對公司的投資中獲得或失去的最多。

Following a 15% increase in the stock price last week, retail investors profited the most, but institutions who own 41% stock also stood to gain from the increase.

上週股價上漲15%,零售投資者獲利最多,但持有41%股票的機構也從漲幅中受益。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about fuboTV.

讓我們更仔細地看一下不同類型的股東對fuboTV能帶給我們什麼信息。

big
NYSE:FUBO Ownership Breakdown July 17th 2024
紐交所:FUBO所有權分佈2024年7月17日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About fuboTV?

機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in fuboTV. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see fuboTV's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所看到的,機構投資者在fuboTV中持有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者之間存在一些可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,存在一種被稱爲“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會爭相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到fuboTV的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更復雜。

big
NYSE:FUBO Earnings and Revenue Growth July 17th 2024
紐交所:FUBO收益和營收增長2024年7月17日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in fuboTV. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 7.8% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.3% of common stock, and State Street Global Advisors, Inc. holds about 2.3% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO David Gandler is the owner of 0.9% of the company's shares.

對fuboTV來說,對沖基金沒有太多的股份。我們的數據顯示,BlackRock, Inc. 是持有流通股的最大股東,佔7.8%。Vanguard Group, Inc. 是第二大股東,持有7.3%的普通股,而State Street Global Advisors, Inc. 持有該公司股票約2.3%。此外,首席執行官 David Gandler 擁有公司股份的0.9%。

A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.

對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of fuboTV

fuboTV的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間是不同的。我們的數據反映了個別內部人員,至少捕捉到了董事會成員。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員也必須向董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in fuboTV Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$8.6m worth of the US$399m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以報告內部人員在fuboTV Inc.中擁有股份。作爲個人,內部人員共持有價值860萬美元的這家39900萬美元公司的股份。看到內部人員進行投資很好,但值得檢查的是這些內部人員是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 56% of fuboTV shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

大部分由個人投資者組成的公衆共持有fuboTV股份的56%。擁有這麼多股權,零售投資者可以共同對影響股東回報的決策發揮作用,例如分紅政策和董事會任命。他們還可以行使投票權,對收購或合併進行投票,這些收購或合併可能無法提高盈利能力。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand fuboTV better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for fuboTV that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮擁有股份的不同群體總是值得思考的。但是,要更好地了解fuboTV,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經發現了fuboTV的3個警告信號,您在投資之前應該知道這些。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有任何反饋?對內容有任何疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論