share_log

With a 41% Stake, Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company

With a 41% Stake, Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company

伊瑞保險公司(NASDAQ: ERIE)內部人持有41%的股份,對公司寄予厚望。
Simply Wall St ·  07/14 22:39

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Erie Indemnity implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
  • 33% of Erie Indemnity is held by Institutions
  • 伊瑞保險的重要內部控制意味着對公司的成長有着既得利益。
  • 共有3家投資者擁有該公司53%的股權。
  • 33%的伊瑞保險由機構持有。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Erie Indemnity Company (NASDAQ:ERIE), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 41% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解伊瑞保險公司(納斯達克:ERIE)的真正控制者,重要的是要了解業務的所有權結構。在公司中持有最多股份的集團,確切地說是41%,是個體內部人員。也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者下跌),該集團將受益最多(或者蒙受最大損失)。

So, insiders of Erie Indemnity have a lot at stake and every decision they make on the company's future is important to them from a financial point of view.

所以,伊瑞保險的內部人員有很大的利害關係,他們對公司未來的每個決定都非常關注,從財務角度來看,這點非常重要。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Erie Indemnity, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解伊瑞保險的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:ERIE Ownership Breakdown July 14th 2024
納斯達克GS:ERIE所有權結構分析2024年7月14日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Erie Indemnity?

機構投資者持有的伊瑞保險股份比較多。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定程度的信譽。然而,依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證最好還是謹慎一些,因爲他們也有錯誤的時候。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一個股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得關注的是伊瑞保險以下的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Erie Indemnity. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Erie Indemnity's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

納斯達克GS:ERIE盈利和營業收入增長2024年7月14日。

big
NasdaqGS:ERIE Earnings and Revenue Growth July 14th 2024
伊瑞保險不被對沖基金所擁有,其最大的股東是托馬斯·哈根,擁有33%的股權,與此同時,第二大股東持有約11%的流通股份,第三大股東持有9.4%的股票。

Erie Indemnity is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Thomas Hagen, with ownership of 33%. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 9.4% by the third-largest shareholder.

看起來內部人員擁有伊瑞保險公司的重要比例。看到內部人員在這家規模爲190億美元的公司中佔據了近79億美元的股份很有意思。看一下這裏,看看這些內部人員最近是否有買入。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.

總的來說,包括散戶投資者在內,公衆擁有公司的14%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。儘管這種所有權的規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

雖然研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師情緒來了解風向也是有意義的。雖然有些股票受到分析師的關注,但該公司可能並未受到廣泛關注。因此,它可能在路上獲得更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of Erie Indemnity

持有16%的普通公衆投資者,主要是個人投資者,對伊瑞保險有一定影響力。雖然這個集團不能決定公司的命運,但他們肯定可以對公司的運營產生實際影響。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Erie Indemnity Company. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$7.9b stake in this US$19b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看起來內部人員擁有伊瑞保險公司的重要比例。看到內部人員在這家規模爲190億美元的公司中佔據了近79億美元的股份很有意思。看一下這裏,看看這些內部人員最近是否有買入。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Erie Indemnity. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

私人企業持有伊瑞保險的11%的股份。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此有必要了解持有那些私人公司的股份。有時,內部人員或其他相關人員可能通過單獨的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

It seems that Private Companies own 11%, of the Erie Indemnity stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

私人企業持有伊瑞保險的11%的股份。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,因此有必要了解持有那些私人公司的股份。有時,內部人員或其他相關人員可能通過單獨的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論