share_log

Following a 10% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please W. P. Carey Inc. (NYSE:WPC) Institutional Owners

Following a 10% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please W. P. Carey Inc. (NYSE:WPC) Institutional Owners

在去年下跌10%之後,最近的漲勢或會讓W. P. Carey Inc.(紐交所:WPC)的機構所有者感到滿意。
Simply Wall St ·  07/13 01:18

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, W. P. Carey's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 17 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • 由於機構持有該股票的大量份額,W. P. Carey的股票價格可能會受到他們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前17大股東持有該公司51%的股份。
  • 通過分析師預測數據和所有權研究,您可以更好地評估公司未來的業績。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of W. P. Carey Inc. (NYSE:WPC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 71% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解W. P. Carey Inc.(NYSE:WPC)實際掌控權的歸屬,重要的是要了解業務的所有者結構。由於持有71%的股份,機構在該公司中擁有最多的股份。換句話說,這個群體最有可能從他們在公司中的投資中獲得最多的(或是損失最多的)利益。

Last week's US$584m market cap gain would probably be appreciated by institutional investors, especially after a year of 10% losses.

上週市值增加了5840萬美元,這可能會受到機構投資者的讚賞,特別是在經歷了10%的虧損後。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of W. P. Carey.

在下面的圖表中,我們將聚焦於W. P. Carey的不同所有權組。

big
NYSE:WPC Ownership Breakdown July 12th 2024
NYSE:WPC 所有權分解圖(截至2024年7月12日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About W. P. Carey?

機構投資者對W. P. Carey的所有權結構意味着什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in W. P. Carey. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of W. P. Carey, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如你所見,機構投資者在W. P. Carey中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者間存在一些信任。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出某個股票,股價下跌是很常見的。因此,值得檢查W. P. Carey以往的盈利軌跡(下面)。當然,還要記住其他因素,這也值得考慮。

big
NYSE:WPC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 12th 2024
NYSE:WPC 盈利與營業收入增長情況(截至2024年7月12日)

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in W. P. Carey. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 5.5% of the stock.

機構投資者擁有該公司超過50%的股份,因此他們聯合起來可以有力地影響董事會決策。我們注意到,對於持有14%的未流通股份,The Vanguard Group,Inc. 是最大的股東。與此相比,第二大和第三大股東分別持有該股票約12%和5.5%的股份。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東註冊表上看,我們可以看到前17名股東控制了51%的股份所有權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股權所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of W. P. Carey

W. P. Carey 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that W. P. Carey Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$73m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的信息表明,W. P. Carey Inc.內部人持有該公司的股份不到1%。由於公司規模如此之大,我們不指望內部人持有大量的股票。總體而言,他們擁有7300萬美元的股票。看到內部人持有至少一部分股份總是好的,但可能值得檢查這些內部人是否一直在賣出股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in W. P. Carey. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通大衆,通常是個體投資者,在W. P. Carey中持有28%的股份。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以在他們的利益方面左右政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司的政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand W. P. Carey better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with W. P. Carey (at least 1 which shouldn't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

思考持有某個公司股票的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解W. P. Carey,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,一直存在的投資風險。我們已經識別出了W. P. Carey的3個警告信號(至少有一個不應忽略),理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論