share_log

Is Masimo (NASDAQ:MASI) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Masimo (NASDAQ:MASI) Using Too Much Debt?

麥斯莫醫療(納斯達克股票代碼:MASI)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 20:14

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Masimo Corporation (NASDAQ:MASI) makes use of debt. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?

作爲投資者,有人認爲相較於債務,波動性更能反映風險,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說:波動性遠不代表風險。當你考慮風險時,自然會審查一家公司的資產負債表,因爲很多時候企業倒閉都涉及到負債。就像許多公司一樣,麥斯莫醫療(納斯達克股票代碼:MASI)也運用了債務。但是,股東們應該擔心它使用債務嗎?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

爲什麼債務會帶來風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

一般來說,當一家公司無法輕鬆償還債務時,債務才成爲真正的問題,無論是通過籌集資金還是自有現金流進行還債。 在最糟糕的情況下,如果一家公司無法償還其債權人,那麼該公司可能會破產。 雖然這種情況並不太常見,但我們經常看到負債的公司永久性地稀釋股東,因爲借款人強制要求他們以低於書面價格的價格籌集資本。 話雖這麼說,最常見的情況是公司合理地管理了債務-並從中獲得了自身的好處。 當我們考慮一家公司使用債務的情況時,我們首先看現金和債務的總量。

What Is Masimo's Net Debt?

麥斯莫的淨債務是多少?

As you can see below, Masimo had US$876.0m of debt at March 2024, down from US$929.1m a year prior. However, it also had US$157.6m in cash, and so its net debt is US$718.4m.

如下圖所示,截止至2024年3月,麥斯莫的債務總額爲8,760萬美元,低於前一年的9,291萬美元。 然而,它同時擁有1,5760萬美元的現金,因此其淨債務爲7,1840萬美元。

big
NasdaqGS:MASI Debt to Equity History July 11th 2024
納斯達克:MASI股票的資產負債歷史。2024年7月11日

How Strong Is Masimo's Balance Sheet?

麥斯莫的資產負債表有多強?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Masimo had liabilities of US$504.2m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.09b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$157.6m in cash and US$401.0m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.03b.

從最近的資產負債表上,我們可以看到,麥斯莫應付年內的負債總額爲5,0420萬美元,遠期負債總額爲1.09億美元。相比之下,它現金爲1,5760萬美元,應收賬款爲4,0100萬美元。因此,其負債總額超過了現金和(短期)應收賬款數之和,達到了10.3億美元。

Of course, Masimo has a market capitalization of US$5.69b, so these liabilities are probably manageable. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

當然,麥斯莫的市值爲5.69億美元,因此這些負債可能是可以承受的。但存在足夠的負債,我們肯定會建議股東繼續關注資產負債表情況。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.

爲了對公司的債務相對於其收益進行規模適應,我們計算其淨債務與利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)之比及其稅前收益(EBIT)與利息支出之比(利息保障倍數)。因此,我們既考慮到不包括折舊和攤銷費用在內的收益,又包括折舊和攤銷費用的收益相對於債務。

Masimo has a debt to EBITDA ratio of 3.3 and its EBIT covered its interest expense 3.0 times. Taken together this implies that, while we wouldn't want to see debt levels rise, we think it can handle its current leverage. Worse, Masimo's EBIT was down 31% over the last year. If earnings continue to follow that trajectory, paying off that debt load will be harder than convincing us to run a marathon in the rain. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Masimo can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

麥斯莫的債務/息稅折舊前利潤(EBITDA)比率爲3.3,其EBIT能夠覆蓋3.0倍利息費用。總體而言,雖然我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但認爲它可以處理當前的槓桿率。更糟糕的是,麥斯莫的EBIT在過去一年中下降了31%。如果收益繼續跟隨這種軌跡發展,償還債務負擔將比說服我們在雨中跑馬拉松更加困難。分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始的顯而易見的地方。但最終企業的未來盈利能力將決定麥斯莫是否能夠隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想看看專業人士的看法,可以看看這份關於分析師收益預測的免費報告。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Masimo recorded free cash flow of 31% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,公司只能用現金而不是會計利潤支付債務。因此,我們明確需要審查EBIT是否導致相應的自由現金流。從最近三年來看,麥斯莫的自由現金流佔其EBIT的比例爲31%,相對較弱。當涉及償還債務時,這並不理想。

Our View

我們的觀點

Mulling over Masimo's attempt at (not) growing its EBIT, we're certainly not enthusiastic. But at least its level of total liabilities is not so bad. It's also worth noting that Masimo is in the Medical Equipment industry, which is often considered to be quite defensive. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making Masimo stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example - Masimo has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

仔細權衡麥斯莫試圖(不)增加其EBIT的努力,我們明顯不那麼樂觀。但至少其總負債水平並不那麼糟糕。值得注意的是,麥斯莫處於醫療設備行業,該行業常被認爲具有很強的防禦性。查看資產負債表並考慮所有這些因素後,我們認爲債務使得麥斯莫股票具有一定的風險。有些人喜歡這種風險,但我們謹慎地考慮潛在風險,因此可能更願意讓它承擔更少的債務。當分析債務水平時,資產負債表是開始的顯而易見的地方。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,這一點遠非如此。例如,麥斯莫有1個警告信號,我們認爲您應該了解。

Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.

當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有負債負擔的股票的投資者,則今天就可以發現我們的獨家淨現金增長股清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論