share_log

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX) With 86% Ownership

Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX) With 86% Ownership

機構投資者持有拉姆研究公司(納斯達克:LRCX)的股份達86%
Simply Wall St ·  07/11 20:08

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Lam Research's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 由於機構所持有的大量股份,拉姆研究的股價可能受到它們的交易決策的影響。
  • 前21大股東擁有該公司50%的股份。
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Lam Research Corporation (NASDAQ:LRCX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 86% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

爲了了解拉姆研究公司(NASDAQ:LRCX)真正的控制者是誰,了解其業務的所有權結構非常重要。機構持有86% 的股份,是該公司的最大股東。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險) 。

And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 4.1% last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 83%.

因此,上週該公司股價上漲了4.1%,機構投資者從中獲得了最多的回報。上週的收益還將進一步提高股東的回報,目前該公司的一年回報率爲83%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lam Research, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解拉姆研究的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:LRCX Ownership Breakdown July 11th 2024
納斯達克LRCX的所有權分佈 2024年7月11日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lam Research?

機構所有權告訴我們拉姆研究的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lam Research. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lam Research's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在拉姆研究中擁有相當大的股份。這可能表明該公司在投資社區享有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過分依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會存在他們在“擁擠的交易”中的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會爭相快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以看到拉姆研究的歷史業績和營業收入,但請記住故事總是更復雜的。

big
NasdaqGS:LRCX Earnings and Revenue Growth July 11th 2024
納斯達克LRCX的收入和營收增長2024年7月11日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Lam Research is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that BlackRock, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 9.3% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 9.1% and 4.4% of the stock.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有該公司的超過一半股份,因此他們可以共同行使重要的權力 。拉姆研究不是由對沖基金所擁有。我們的數據顯示,貝萊德(BlackRock, Inc.)是最大的股東,持有該公司9.3%的流通股。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有約9.1%和4.4%的股票。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

經過進一步調查,我們發現前21名股東擁有公司的50%股權,表明沒有單一的股東對公司有重大控制權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Lam Research

拉姆研究的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Lam Research Corporation. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$415m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部人員擁有拉姆研究公司不到1%的股份。這是一家非常大的公司,因此看到內部人員擁有該公司的大部分股份是令人驚訝的。儘管他們的持股不足1%,但我們可以看到,董事會成員共持有價值4150萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。最近的買賣是同樣重要的考慮因素。您可以點擊此處查看內部人員是否一直在購買或出售。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Lam Research. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有拉姆研究13%的股份。雖然這個團體不能確定公司的決策,但它確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關注內容?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋? 對內容感到擔憂? 請直接與我們聯繫。 或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論