share_log

Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC) Shareholders Have Endured a 8.4% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

Kraft Heinz (NASDAQ:KHC) Shareholders Have Endured a 8.4% Loss From Investing in the Stock Three Years Ago

自三年前購買該股票以來,Kraft Heinz(納斯達克:KHC)的股東們已經遭受了8.4%的損失。
Simply Wall St ·  07/06 22:47

Many investors define successful investing as beating the market average over the long term. But its virtually certain that sometimes you will buy stocks that fall short of the market average returns. Unfortunately, that's been the case for longer term The Kraft Heinz Company (NASDAQ:KHC) shareholders, since the share price is down 20% in the last three years, falling well short of the market return of around 20%. Furthermore, it's down 13% in about a quarter. That's not much fun for holders.

許多投資者定義成功的投資爲長期擊敗市場平均水平。但幾乎可以確定,有時您會購買表現低於市場平均回報的股票。不幸的是,長揸巨型食品生產商The Kraft Heinz Company (納斯達克股票代碼:KHC)的股票價格在過去三年中下跌了20%,遠遠低於市場回報約20%。此外,它在大約一個季度的時間裏下跌了13%。對於持有者而言,這並不好玩。

So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress.

那麼我們來看看這家公司的長期表現是否符合其業務進展情況。

While the efficient markets hypothesis continues to be taught by some, it has been proven that markets are over-reactive dynamic systems, and investors are not always rational. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

雖然一些人仍然在教授高效市場假說,但已經證明市場是過度反應的動態系統,投資者不總是理性的。一種有缺陷但合理的評估公司情緒變化的方法是比較每股收益 (EPS) 與股價。

Although the share price is down over three years, Kraft Heinz actually managed to grow EPS by 74% per year in that time. This is quite a puzzle, and suggests there might be something temporarily buoying the share price. Or else the company was over-hyped in the past, and so its growth has disappointed.

儘管過去三年股價下跌,卡夫亨氏在該時間內實際上實現了每股收益每年74%的增長。這是一個相當棘手的問題,並暗示着股價可能存在暫時性的支撐因素。否則,在歷史上公司被過度虛高,因此其增長沒有如預期那樣。

Since the change in EPS doesn't seem to correlate with the change in share price, it's worth taking a look at other metrics.

由於EPS的變化似乎與股價的變化不相關,因此值得查看其他指標。

We note that the dividend seems healthy enough, so that probably doesn't explain the share price drop. Kraft Heinz has maintained its top line over three years, so we doubt that has shareholders worried. So it might be worth looking at how revenue growth over time, in greater detail.

我們注意到分紅派息似乎足夠健康,所以這可能並不能解釋股價下跌。卡夫亨氏在過去的三年中保持了其營業收入,因此我們懷疑股東擔心此事。因此,可能值得更詳細地查看營收增長的歷史變化。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下面的圖表顯示了收益和營收隨時間的變化情況(通過單擊圖像揭示確切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:KHC Earnings and Revenue Growth July 6th 2024
納斯達克:卡夫亨氏每股收益和營業收入創業板2024年7月6日

Kraft Heinz is a well known stock, with plenty of analyst coverage, suggesting some visibility into future growth. Given we have quite a good number of analyst forecasts, it might be well worth checking out this free chart depicting consensus estimates.

卡夫亨氏是一隻廣受關注的股票,有很多分析師進行覆蓋,這表明有一定的未來增長可見性。由於我們擁有相當多的分析師預測數據,因此很值得查看此圖表中的預計共識估計。

What About Dividends?

那麼分紅怎麼樣呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. It's fair to say that the TSR gives a more complete picture for stocks that pay a dividend. In the case of Kraft Heinz, it has a TSR of -8.4% for the last 3 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. The dividends paid by the company have thusly boosted the total shareholder return.

在考慮投資回報時,重要的是考慮總股東回報(TSR)和股票回報之間的差異。 TSR包括任何剝離或折讓的資本籌集(基於股息被重新投資的假設),以及任何股息。因此,對於支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回報高得多。就中國神威藥業集團而言,其TSR在過去5年中達到了75%。這超過了我們之前提到的股票回報。該公司支付的股息已經提高了總股東回報。總股東回報股票回報儘管股價回報僅反映了股價變化,TSR包括了股息的價值(假設它們已被再次投資)以及任何折扣融資或剝離帶來的好處。毫無疑問,對於支付股息的股票而言,TSR給出了更完整的圖像。就卡夫亨氏而言,它在過去的三年中TSR爲-8.4%,超過了我們先前提到的股價回報。公司支付的股息因此提高了其TSR。股東回報。

A Different Perspective

不同的觀點

Kraft Heinz shareholders are down 5.2% for the year (even including dividends), but the market itself is up 26%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 6% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. It's always interesting to track share price performance over the longer term. But to understand Kraft Heinz better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Kraft Heinz .

卡夫亨氏的股東今年下跌了5.2%(包括股息),但市場本身上漲了26%。即使是優秀的股票的股價有時也會下跌,但在我們產生興趣之前,我們希望看到業務的基本指標有所改善。好消息是,長期持股人獲得了收益,每年平均增長了6%以上。如果基本數據繼續表明長期可持續增長,那麼目前的拋售可能是一個值得考慮的機會。跟蹤股價表現長期而言總是有趣的,但要更好地了解卡夫亨氏,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。爲此,您應該注意我們在與卡夫亨氏相關的兩個警示標誌。

But note: Kraft Heinz may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).

但請注意:卡夫亨氏可能不是最佳的買入股票。因此,可以查看過去收益增長(以及更多增長預測)的有趣公司的免費列表。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.

請注意,本文所引述的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所上市的股票的市場加權平均回報。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論