share_log

With 81% Ownership, The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 81% Ownership, The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

擁有81%股權的J. m. Smucker公司(紐交所:SJM)擁有強大的機構支持。
Simply Wall St ·  07/05 20:25

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies J. M. Smucker's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • 機構股東的持股比例極高,這意味着J. m. Smucker的股票價格對機構股東的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 總共有19個投資者持有該公司大多數股份,佔有51%的股權。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

Every investor in The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 81% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

所有J. m. Smucker Company (NYSE:SJM)的投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有最大一部分股份的群體是機構,持股比例爲81%。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果有下跌,損失最大)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於他們擁有的巨額資金和研究能力,機構所有權往往具有很大的影響力,特別是對於個人投資者來說。因此,擁有大量機構資金投資於公司往往被認爲是一種令人嚮往的品質。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of J. M. Smucker, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們更深入地研究J. m. Smucker的每種所有者類型,從下圖開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:SJM Ownership Breakdown July 5th 2024
NYSE:SJm所有權分佈2024年7月5日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About J. M. Smucker?

機構持有權告訴我們什麼關於J. m. Smucker?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that J. M. Smucker does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of J. M. Smucker, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

我們可以看到J. m. Smucker確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有公司的大量股票。這表明專業投資者們持續信任該公司。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會犯錯誤,就像其他人一樣。如果兩個大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,股價暴跌也是很常見的。因此,值得檢查一下J. m. Smucker過去的盈利軌跡(如下)。當然,還要記住也有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:SJM Earnings and Revenue Growth July 5th 2024
NYSE:SJm收益和營業收入增長2024年7月5日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. J. M. Smucker is not owned by hedge funds. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 6.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上持有公司超過一半的股份,因此他們可以集體行使重大的影響力。J. m. Smucker不是由對沖基金持有的。目前,The Vanguard Group, Inc.是該公司最大的股東,持有12%的流通股份。爲了更好的了解情況,第二大股東持有約8.6%的流通股份,第三大股東持有6.2%的所有權。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 19 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

觀察股東登記表,我們可以看到51%的所有權由前19位股東控制,這意味着沒有單一的股東掌握了多數股權所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。由於有相當數量的分析師涵蓋這支股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有所幫助。

Insider Ownership Of J. M. Smucker

J. m. Smucker的內部持股權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能會稍有不同,但董事會成員始終算入其中。公司管理負責經營業務,但即使首席執行官是董事會成員,他或她也必須對董事會負責。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can see that insiders own shares in The J. M. Smucker Company. Insiders own US$405m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以看到J. m. Smucker Company的內部人員持有股份。內部人員擁有4,0500萬美元的股份(按當前價格計算)。大多數人會認爲這表明股東和董事會之間有良好的利益一致性。但是,還值得檢查這些內部人員是否一直在拋售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in J. M. Smucker. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公衆持有J. m. Smucker 15%的股份,雖然這種股權的大小可能不足以影響公司的政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand J. M. Smucker better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for J. M. Smucker you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit concerning.

思考擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地了解J. m. Smucker,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。事實證明:我們已經看到了J. m. Smucker的3個警示,您應該了解其中1個有點令人擔憂。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

譯文內容由第三人軟體翻譯。


以上內容僅用作資訊或教育之目的,不構成與富途相關的任何投資建議。富途竭力但無法保證上述全部內容的真實性、準確性和原創性。
    搶先評論